mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Fog Chamber to Aircraft Window: Pixel-Registered Imaging and Synthetic Fine-Tuning Enable Cross-Domain Defogging

arXiv 2606.29093 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2026cs.CV physics.opticscited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A deep defogging pipeline pretrained on controlled laboratory fog and fine-tuned with domain-randomized synthetic fog applied to clear outdoor scenes generalizes across a graded sequence of out-of-distribution settings with no target-domain training, from chamber-free free-flowing fog to iPhone video recorded through an aircraft cabin window in flight, an entirely unseen sensor, scene, and optical path. This directly addresses an open transfer limitation reported for real-world binocular defogging. Two design choices support the transfer. First, a single-camera fog imager photographs a flat-panel display through an artificial-fog enclosure with a fixed 114~mm scattering path, producing 5,495 pixel-aligned foggy/clear pairs. Exact registration permits a paired Laplacian ratio that predicts per-image restoration quality far better than single-image proxies (Spearman ρ = 0.632 versus 0.399) and supports pixel-exact L1 reconstruction training that avoids adversarial hallucination. Second, the fog-chamber checkpoint is fine-tuned on Mapillary Vistas crops overlaid with on-the-fly randomized synthetic fog spanning a broad range of strengths, spatial variations, airlights, and noise conditions. On a 552-image held-out split, a uniform comparison of 30 restoration backbones places NAFNet at the top (24.33~dB~/~0.7912~SSIM), with a compact alternative within 1.29~dB at 3% of the parameter count, and a ResNet-50 classifier confirms that the restoration preserves semantic content rather than only pixel-level structure. On unpaired aircraft-window video, NIQE decreases from a mean of 6.22 to 4.97 after fine-tuning, with temporally stable output across full-motion sequences. The same backbone, under paired supervision, also reaches 20.71~dB~/~0.683~SSIM on a non-overlapping O-HAZE/NH-HAZE split (a transferability check rather than a competitive ranking).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2026.

Builds on

15 of 29 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  4. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,527
  5. 2022Simple Baselines for Image Restorationcited by 708
  6. 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 403
  7. 2016DehazeNet: An End-to-End System for Single Image Haze Removalcited by 314
  8. 2019FFA-Net: Feature Fusion Attention Network for Single Image Dehazingcited by 307
  9. 2022Vision Transformers for Single Image Dehazingcited by 260
  10. 2019GridDehazeNet: Attention-Based Multi-Scale Network for Image Dehazingcited by 227
  11. 2020NH-HAZE: An Image Dehazing Benchmark with Non-Homogeneous Hazy and Haze-Free Imagescited by 108
  12. 2018Model Adaptation with Synthetic and Real Data for Semantic Dense Foggy Scene Understandingcited by 98
3 more
  1. 2018O-HAZE: a dehazing benchmark with real hazy and haze-free outdoor imagescited by 95
  2. 2023Prompt-based test-time real image dehazing: a novel pipelinecited by 12
  3. 2025Tokenize Image Patches: Global Context Fusion for Effective Haze Removal in Large Imagescited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.