FedLAS: Feature-Modulated Bidirectional Label Smoothing for Neural Network Calibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Neural Network (DNN) classifiers suffer from poor calibration when their softmax outputs (predictive confidence) deviate from the empirical likelihoods. This manifests itself as either overconfident incorrect predictions or under-confident correct predictions. Label smoothing (LS) enhances model calibration by introducing entropy regularization during training through redistributing probability mass from the ground-truth label to the remaining classes. LS, including Margin-based LS (MbLS), have restrictive assumptions: they rely on predefined, uniform smoothing rules and only tackle overconfidence. In reality, samples exhibit diverse characteristics, such as difficulty/ambiguity, that interact with the evolving nature of the model being trained. In training, samples may have various degrees of under- or overconfidence. To overcome this, a mechanism that identifies the specific confidence state of each sample and determines the appropriate degree of smoothing in each training step is needed, tailoring the adjustment to the individual sample. We propose FedLAS: Feature-Modulated Bidirectional Label Smoothing, a plug-and-play algorithm for label smoothing-based losses. In FedLAS, we introduce a Feature Norm-based Confidence Indicator (NCI) to control smoothing and a Bidirectional Calibration Gating (BCG) module to detect both over and under-confidence. Our algorithm can be integrated with LS and MbLS based losses when applied to standard DNNs, enhancing performance. Extensive experiments on standard and fine-grained high-resolution vision benchmarks show that FedLAS consistently improves calibration compared to modern baselines, reducing Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Adaptive ECE while maintaining Top-1 accuracy. Code: github.com/nadarasarbahavan/FEDLAS
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.
Builds on
35 of 45 references.
References · 35
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,079
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
- 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 446
23 more
- 2022AdaFace: Quality Adaptive Margin for Face Recognitioncited by 391
- 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 357
- 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 353
- 2015Probabilistic Backpropagation for Scalable Learning of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 295
- 2023Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applicationscited by 210
- 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
- 2020Hyperparameter Ensembles for Robustness and Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 150
- 2020Confidence-Aware Learning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 113
- 2021The Devil is in the Margin: Margin-based Label Smoothing for Network Calibrationcited by 91
- 2016Structured and Efficient Variational Deep Learning with Matrix Gaussian Posteriorscited by 82
- 2020Post-hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarioscited by 61
- 2022A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: A Train-Time Regularizing Loss for Improved Neural Network Calibrationcited by 49
- 2021von Mises-Fisher Loss: An Exploration of Embedding Geometries for Supervised Learningcited by 42
- 2023Dual Focal Loss for Calibrationcited by 33
- 2022AdaFocal: Calibration-aware Adaptive Focal Losscited by 32
- 2023Understanding the Feature Norm for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 27
- 2023RankMixup: Ranking-Based Mixup Training for Network Calibrationcited by 19
- 2021Orthogonal Ensemble Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 16
- 2023ACLS: Adaptive and Conditional Label Smoothing for Network Calibrationcited by 15
- 2023Beyond Probability Partitions: Calibrating Neural Networks with Semantic Aware Groupingcited by 10
- 2024Feature Clipping for Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 8
- 2024Decoupling Feature Extraction and Classification Layers for Calibrated Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2023Rule-based Out-Of-Distribution Detectioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026RAPID: Reliability-Aware Pair Importance Distillationcited by 0
- 2026RAPID: Reliability-Aware Pair Importance Distillation23 Aug 2026