NuclearQAv2: A Structured Benchmark for Evaluating Domain-Science Competence in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of tasks, but ensuring their reliability in highly technical domains remains a significant challenge. In nuclear engineering, problem solving often requires not only factual knowledge but also quantitative reasoning and conceptual understanding. To address the need for systematic evaluation in this domain, we introduce NuclearQAv2, a benchmark for assessing LLMs on nuclear engineering knowledge. The benchmark comprises approximately 1,240 question-answer pairs spanning three categories: boolean, numeric, and verbal. NuclearQAv2 is constructed using a hybrid pipeline that combines expert-authored questions, existing datasets, and LLM-assisted generation from domain-specific technical corpora. By leveraging structured prompting for both automated question generation and response evaluation, the proposed framework enables scalable benchmark construction and evaluation. We evaluate a diverse set of LLMs using NuclearQAv2 and observe substantial performance differences across task types. While the models generally perform well on factual questions, quantitative reasoning and conceptual understanding remain considerably more challenging. These results highlight the importance of multi-faceted evaluation frameworks and establish NuclearQAv2 as a scalable benchmark for assessing LLM capabilities in technical domains.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.
Builds on
24 of 31 references.
References · 24
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
12 more
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
- 2023A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Modelscited by 368
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 336
- 2023Nougat: Neural Optical Understanding for Academic Documentscited by 245
- 2024Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlookcited by 188
- 2023Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Taskscited by 169
- 2019Synthetic QA Corpora Generation with Roundtrip Consistencycited by 143
- 2023ExpertQA: Expert-Curated Questions and Attributed Answerscited by 97
- 2020Training Question Answering Models From Synthetic Datacited by 95
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Critical Societal Domains: Finance, Healthcare, and Lawcited by 74
- 2025PRBench: Large-Scale Expert Rubrics for Evaluating High-Stakes Professional Reasoningcited by 32
- 2023NuclearQA: A Human-Made Benchmark for Language Models for the Nuclear Domaincited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.