mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

USS: Unifying Spatial-Semantic Prompting for End to End Embodied Visual Tracking

arXiv 2606.25880 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Embodied Visual Tracking (EVT) requires an agent to continuously follow a designated target while moving through dynamic environments. Existing embodied tracking methods generally rely on either an implicit target-selection convention or a language description, leaving the target-specification interface largely fixed. However, different tracking scenarios naturally favor different forms of target specification: language can specify a target outside the robot's current view, whereas spatial prompts provide direct instance designation for visible targets and can be useful for selecting among similar looking people, designating hard-to-describe individuals, or specifying a target under time pressure. We therefore introduce unified spatial-semantic prompting for EVT, in which text, a point, a box, and a mask serve as complementary target specifications that can be selected according to different scenarios, and present USS, an end-to-end architecture that maps any of them to egocentric waypoints. A modality-specific prompt encoder feeds a common design comprising hybrid-attention fusion, temporal memory, cross-view aggregation, latent prediction, and waypoint decoding, with one policy instance trained for each interface under an identical recipe. Across 320 zero-shot real-robot trials with policies trained only in simulation, spatial prompts perform comparably to language in ordinary tracking scenarios while providing clear benefits when visually similar targets require precise instance designation, supporting our premise that different scenarios favor different target specifications. On simulation EVT-Bench under the standard language-prompt protocol, USS obtains the highest success rate among non-MLLM methods at 57 FPS, against the 4.8-10 FPS reported by MLLM trackers that are stronger on several metrics. Project site: https://arescheah.github.io/uss-project-page/.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.

Builds on

40 of 48 references.

References · 40

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  3. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  4. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,887
  5. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
  6. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,838
  7. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,407
  8. 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,761
  9. 2025GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robotscited by 1,225
  10. 2021Grounded Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 1,156
  11. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
  12. 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 809
28 more
  1. 2022PETR: Position Embedding Transformation for Multi-View 3D Object Detectioncited by 552
  2. 2023Segment Everything Everywhere All at Oncecited by 548
  3. 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Videocited by 531
  4. 2025Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the networkcited by 326
  5. 2024TraceVLA: Visual Trace Prompting Enhances Spatial-Temporal Awareness for Generalist Robotic Policiescited by 304
  6. 2022Visual Prompting via Image Inpaintingcited by 250
  7. 2023Track Anything: Segment Anything Meets Videoscited by 234
  8. 2024PIVOT: Iterative Visual Prompting Elicits Actionable Knowledge for VLMscited by 190
  9. 2024Uni-NaVid: A Video-based Vision-Language-Action Model for Unifying Embodied Navigation Taskscited by 156
  10. 2023Visual Prompt Multi-Modal Trackingcited by 142
  11. 2024MOKA: Open-World Robotic Manipulation through Mark-Based Visual Promptingcited by 129
  12. 2026V-JEPA 2.1: Unlocking Dense Features in Video Self-Supervised Learningcited by 117
  13. 2023Fine-Grained Visual Promptingcited by 82
  14. 2025Embodied Navigation Foundation Modelcited by 72
  15. 2024PoliFormer: Scaling On-Policy RL with Transformers Results in Masterful Navigatorscited by 58
  16. 2025TrackVLA: Embodied Visual Tracking in the Wildcited by 47
  17. 2018End-to-end Active Object Tracking and Its Real-world Deployment via Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  18. 2024Empowering Embodied Visual Tracking with Visual Foundation Models and Offline RLcited by 23
  19. 2025TrackVLA++: Unleashing Reasoning and Memory Capabilities in VLA Models for Embodied Visual Trackingcited by 17
  20. 2026VP-VLA: Visual Prompting as an Interface for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 17
  21. 2023RSPT: Reconstruct Surroundings and Predict Trajectories for Generalizable Active Object Trackingcited by 16
  22. 2024Improving Visual Object Tracking through Visual Promptingcited by 9
  23. 2025Natural Multimodal Fusion-Based Human-Robot Interaction: Application With Voice and Deictic Posture via Large Language Modelcited by 4
  24. 2025FAM-HRI: Foundation-Model Assisted Multi-Modal Human-Robot Interaction Combining Gaze and Speechcited by 4
  25. 2024Towards Embedding Dynamic Personas in Interactive Robots: Masquerading Animated Social Kinematics (MASK)cited by 3
  26. 2025Using Physiological Measures, Gaze, and Facial Expressions to Model Human Trust in a Robot Partnercited by 3
  27. 2024Gaze-based Human-Robot Interaction System for Infrastructure Inspectionscited by 2
  28. 2026GesVLA: Gesture-Aware Vision-Language-Action Model Embedded Representationscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ReferTrack: Referring Then Tracking for Embodied Visual Tracking
  2. 2025Hierarchical Instruction-aware Embodied Visual Tracking
  3. 2026VLX-Go: Robust Embodied Tracking through Multi-Stage Learning and On-Policy Refinement
  4. 2025EPIPTrack: Rethinking Prompt Modeling with Explicit and Implicit Prompts for Multi-Object Tracking
  5. 2026CST-WM: A Causally Structured World Model for Embodied Visual Tracking
  6. 2026LightNav-0: Eliciting VLM Spatial Intelligence for Generalist Embodied Navigation
  7. 2026MachEmbodied-U0: Unified Understanding and Generation Model for Embodied Intelligence
  8. 2026EPIC-Bench: A Perception-Centric Benchmark for Fine-Grained Embodied Visual Grounding in Vision-Language Models