mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning with a Single Rollout via Monte Carlo Pass@k Critic

arXiv 2606.25451 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Estimating token-level advantages in reinforcement learning (RL) for language models remains challenging because scaling up episodic experience collection is expensive. The difficulty intensifies for baseline advantage estimation methods, where repeated sampling causes trajectories to diverge into substantially different reasoning prefixes. In this context, RL algorithms such as GRPO prove limited: an outcome reward is too sparse to be attributed to specific actions like intermediate steps, and comparisons across sampled traces are non-trivial because they are heterogeneous. To mitigate both the computational cost of repeated sampling and the difficulty of credit assignment, we study single-rollout proximal policy optimization (SR-PPO) featuring token-level credit assignment in RL for language models. Instead of estimating advantages by normalizing episodic returns within the candidate group, we train a calibrated token-level credit critic using Monte Carlo outcomes from one rollout per prompt. Specifically, we use the critic to predict the Pass@k success probability at the prompt prefix, which is derived from a Pass@1 attempt. This choice yields a more selective learning signal than Pass@1: it discounts easily solved prefixes while prioritizing hard ones whose success probability remains marginal. We show that as k increases, Pass@k converges to a reachability indicator, reflecting whether a prefix can lead to at least one successful continuation. In an explicit state graph, the limit (k rightarrow ∞) can be computed in O(|V|+|E|) time, offering a promising surrogate for direct credit assignment without the need to sample contrastive traces. As an initial validation, SR-PPO exhibits stable learning dynamics, along with consistent gains in Pass@128 success rates on mathematical reasoning benchmarks such as HMMT26 and AIME24.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.

Builds on

32 of 38 references.

References · 32

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  6. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  7. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  8. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  9. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  10. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  11. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  12. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
20 more
  1. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
  2. 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewardscited by 478
  3. 2025Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Trainingcited by 442
  4. 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
  5. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 267
  6. 2025ProRL: Prolonged Reinforcement Learning Expands Reasoning Boundaries in Large Language Modelscited by 187
  7. 2026Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMscited by 115
  8. 2025ARPO:End-to-End Policy Optimization for GUI Agents with Experience Replaycited by 75
  9. 2025AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progresscited by 69
  10. 2025SPA-RL: Reinforcing LLM Agents via Stepwise Progress Attributioncited by 68
  11. 2025TreePO: Bridging the Gap of Policy Optimization and Efficacy and Inference Efficiency with Heuristic Tree-based Modelingcited by 60
  12. 2025Information Gain-based Policy Optimization: A Simple and Effective Approach for Multi-Turn Search Agentscited by 43
  13. 2025MCPMark: A Benchmark for Stress-Testing Realistic and Comprehensive MCP Usecited by 37
  14. 2026Hierarchy-of-Groups Policy Optimization for Long-Horizon Agentic Taskscited by 37
  15. 2025Exploiting Tree Structure for Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMscited by 27
  16. 2026OneMillion-Bench: How Far are Language Agents from Human Experts?cited by 13
  17. 2025Native Parallel Reasoner: Reasoning in Parallelism via Self-Distilled Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  18. 2026The AI Hippocampus: How Far are We From Human Memory?cited by 11
  19. 2026Evolving-RL: End-to-End Optimization of Experience-Driven Self-Evolving Capability within Agentscited by 7
  20. 2026Likelihood-Based Reward Designs for General LLM Reasoningcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Segment Policy Optimization: Effective Segment-Level Credit Assignment in RL for Large Language Models
  2. 2026EPIG-Tree: Compute-Optimal Branching for Gradient-Efficient Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026Generate, Filter, Control, Replay: A Comprehensive Survey of Rollout Strategies for LLM Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026BASIS: Batchwise Advantage Estimation from Single-Rollout Information Sharing for LLM Reasoning
  5. 2026Beyond Negative Rollouts: Positive-Only Policy Optimization with Implicit Negative Gradients
  6. 2026Spend Your Rollouts Where It Counts: Rollout Allocation for Group-Based RL Post-Training
  7. 2026Not all tokens are needed(NAT): token efficient reinforcement learning
  8. 2024Entropy-Regularized Token-Level Policy Optimization for Language Agent Reinforcement