mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data Augmentation: A Fourier Analysis Perspective

arXiv 2606.24418 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data augmentation is a simple and model-agnostic approach for exploiting known invariances in learning problems. Given a group acting on the input space, one augments the training set with transformed copies of each sample. Because it exploits symmetries without modifying the underlying learning algorithm, data augmentation can be applied broadly across learning methods. However, this universality comes at a computational cost: when the group is large, full group-sized augmentation quickly becomes computationally infeasible. This raises a fundamental question: Can partial data augmentation achieve the same statistical benefits as full augmentation in terms of generalization and sample complexity? We develop a general framework for investigating this question using Fourier analysis and the representation theory of finite groups. We show that, for a broad class of classical learning problems, partial data augmentation based on a randomly sampled subset of group elements achieves the same minimax rates as full augmentation, up to an approximation error that vanishes as the subset size increases. Our results provide a theoretical explanation for why partial augmentation can retain the statistical benefits of full augmentation despite enforcing symmetry only approximately, and shed light on a recently raised question in learning with symmetries: whether statistically optimal learning under general group invariances can be achieved using computationally scalable methods. Moreover, we prove a complementary impossibility result: enforcing exact invariance via data augmentation requires averaging over the entire group, and cannot be achieved by any strict subset when the hypothesis space is sufficiently expressive. Together, these results provide a unified perspective on full and partial data augmentation, as well as exact and approximate symmetry enforcement.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.

Builds on

37 of 60 references.

References · 37

  1. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
  2. 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 701
  3. 2021Frame Averaging for Invariant and Equivariant Network Designcited by 166
  4. 2023Artificial Intelligence for Science in Quantum, Atomistic, and Continuum Systemscited by 118
  5. 2018A Kernel Theory of Modern Data Augmentationcited by 106
  6. 2022Equivariance with Learned Canonicalization Functionscited by 106
  7. 2022Approximately Equivariant Networks for Imperfectly Symmetric Dynamicscited by 95
  8. 2021Learning with invariances in random features and kernel modelscited by 89
  9. 2021Automatic Symmetry Discovery with Lie Algebra Convolutional Networkcited by 82
  10. 2021Data Augmentation Approaches in Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 82
  11. 2021Residual Pathway Priors for Soft Equivariance Constraintscited by 74
  12. 2022Graph Data Augmentation for Graph Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 61
25 more
  1. 2023Approximation-Generalization Trade-offs under (Approximate) Group Equivariancecited by 45
  2. 2021Learning Partial Equivariances from Datacited by 44
  3. 2022Relaxing Equivariance Constraints with Non-stationary Continuous Filterscited by 41
  4. 2024Equivariant Frames and the Impossibility of Continuous Canonicalizationcited by 41
  5. 2023Generative Adversarial Symmetry Discoverycited by 40
  6. 2023Latent Space Symmetry Discoverycited by 29
  7. 2022Sample Efficiency of Data Augmentation Consistency Regularizationcited by 28
  8. 2023The Exact Sample Complexity Gain from Invariances for Kernel Regressioncited by 27
  9. 2023Toward Understanding Generative Data Augmentationcited by 25
  10. 2024A Canonicalization Perspective on Invariant and Equivariant Learningcited by 25
  11. 2022The good, the bad and the ugly sides of data augmentation: An implicit spectral regularization perspectivecited by 24
  12. 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Data Augmentation in Visual Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
  13. 2023Learning Layer-wise Equivariances Automatically using Gradientscited by 23
  14. 2024Lie Algebra Canonicalization: Equivariant Neural Operators under arbitrary Lie Groupscited by 23
  15. 2023Regularizing Towards Soft Equivariance Under Mixed Symmetriescited by 16
  16. 2024Symmetry Discovery Beyond Affine Transformationscited by 14
  17. 2024On the hardness of learning under symmetriescited by 13
  18. 2023Understanding the Detrimental Class-level Effects of Data Augmentationcited by 12
  19. 2023Generalized equivalences between subsampling and ridge regularizationcited by 10
  20. 2024Approximate Equivariance in Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  21. 2025Achieving Approximate Symmetry Is Exponentially Easier than Exact Symmetrycited by 6
  22. 2025Invariant Kernels: Rank Stabilization and Generalization Across Dimensionscited by 5
  23. 2025Learning with Exact Invariances in Polynomial Timecited by 5
  24. 2022Adaptively Weighted Data Augmentation Consistency Regularization for Robust Optimization under Concept Shiftcited by 3
  25. 2025On Universality of Deep Equivariant Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.