Sparse Data Augmentation for Optimization with Provable Guarantees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In nonconvex optimization problems arising in geometric machine learning, data augmentation is commonly used to promote invariance by averaging empirical losses over transformations of the data. Computing the fully augmented objective, however, requires access to every element of the transformation group G, which may be prohibitively expensive when G is large or accessible only through sampling. We study whether full augmentation can instead be approximated using a small, fixed sample of transformations acquired before optimization and reused thereafter. Under suitable regularity conditions, we show that, with probability at least 1-δ, gradient descent (GD) on the resulting sparsely augmented objective returns an varepsilon-stationary point of the fully augmented objective using Obigl((log |G|+log(1/δ))/varepsilon2bigr) group-transformation-oracle queries. By comparison, standard group stochastic gradient descent (group-SGD), which samples a fresh transformation at every iteration, uses O(1/varepsilon4) transformation queries. Therefore, gradient descent with fixed sparse augmentation requires fewer transformation queries than both GD applied to the fully augmented objective and group-SGD. Our proof techniques, which may be of independent interest, establish a uniform approximation of the full group-averaged gradient field by a random group average using spectral properties of group-induced operators and tools from representation theory.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.
Builds on
51 of 65 references.
References · 51
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
- 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 708
- 2019Momentum-Based Variance Reduction in Non-Convex SGDcited by 306
- 2018SPIDER: Near-Optimal Non-Convex Optimization via Stochastic Path Integrated Differential Estimatorcited by 287
- 2017SARAH: A Novel Method for Machine Learning Problems Using Stochastic Recursive Gradientcited by 220
- 2021Frame Averaging for Invariant and Equivariant Network Designcited by 168
- 2016Stochastic Variance Reduction for Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 145
- 2020Lorentz Group Equivariant Neural Network for Particle Physicscited by 121
- 2023Artificial Intelligence for Science in Quantum, Atomistic, and Continuum Systemscited by 121
- 2020PAGE: A Simple and Optimal Probabilistic Gradient Estimator for Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 119
- 2020Random Reshuffling: Simple Analysis with Vast Improvementscited by 115
38 more
- 2022Equivariance with Learned Canonicalization Functionscited by 109
- 2018A Kernel Theory of Modern Data Augmentationcited by 106
- 2021Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant Modelscited by 91
- 2021Learning with invariances in random features and kernel modelscited by 89
- 2021Automatic Symmetry Discovery with Lie Algebra Convolutional Networkcited by 83
- 2021Residual Pathway Priors for Soft Equivariance Constraintscited by 75
- 2020SGD with shuffling: optimal rates without component convexity and large epoch requirementscited by 58
- 2022Learning Symmetric Embeddings for Equivariant World Modelscited by 54
- 2024Equivariant Frames and the Impossibility of Continuous Canonicalizationcited by 43
- 2022Invariance Learning in Deep Neural Networks with Differentiable Laplace Approximationscited by 42
- 2023Generative Adversarial Symmetry Discoverycited by 42
- 2022Relaxing Equivariance Constraints with Non-stationary Continuous Filterscited by 41
- 2022Sample Efficiency of Data Augmentation Consistency Regularizationcited by 28
- 2023The Exact Sample Complexity Gain from Invariances for Kernel Regressioncited by 28
- 2021Grounding inductive biases in natural images:invariance stems from variations in datacited by 27
- 2024A Canonicalization Perspective on Invariant and Equivariant Learningcited by 27
- 2022The good, the bad and the ugly sides of data augmentation: An implicit spectral regularization perspectivecited by 24
- 2024Lie Algebra Canonicalization: Equivariant Neural Operators under arbitrary Lie Groupscited by 24
- 2023Learning Layer-wise Equivariances Automatically using Gradientscited by 23
- 2021Understanding the Generalization Benefit of Model Invariance from a Data Perspectivecited by 22
- 2022A Theory of PAC Learnability under Transformation Invariancescited by 21
- 2019Lower Bounds for Smooth Nonconvex Finite-Sum Optimizationcited by 20
- 2024Equivariance via Minimal Frame Averaging for More Symmetries and Efficiencycited by 19
- 2022Equivariance Discovery by Learned Parameter-Sharingcited by 18
- 2022Automatic Data Augmentation via Invariance-Constrained Learningcited by 17
- 2023Approximately Equivariant Graph Networkscited by 16
- 2020How Data Augmentation affects Optimization for Linear Regressioncited by 15
- 2023Sample Complexity of Probability Divergences under Group Symmetrycited by 14
- 2022How Tempering Fixes Data Augmentation in Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 13
- 2024On the hardness of learning under symmetriescited by 13
- 2023Sample Complexity Bounds for Estimating Probability Divergences under Invariancescited by 12
- 2022In What Ways Are Deep Neural Networks Invariant and How Should We Measure This?cited by 9
- 2024Approximately Equivariant Neural Processescited by 8
- 2023A Unified Framework for Discovering Discrete Symmetriescited by 7
- 2025Achieving Approximate Symmetry Is Exponentially Easier than Exact Symmetrycited by 7
- 2025Learning with Exact Invariances in Polynomial Timecited by 6
- 2026Data Augmentation: A Fourier Analysis Perspectivecited by 4
- 2026Adaptive Symmetry Discovery for Dynamical System Identificationcited by 3
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.