mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Understanding the Detrimental Class-level Effects of Data Augmentation

arXiv 2401.01764 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data augmentation (DA) encodes invariance and provides implicit regularization critical to a model's performance in image classification tasks. However, while DA improves average accuracy, recent studies have shown that its impact can be highly class dependent: achieving optimal average accuracy comes at the cost of significantly hurting individual class accuracy by as much as 20% on ImageNet. There has been little progress in resolving class-level accuracy drops due to a limited understanding of these effects. In this work, we present a framework for understanding how DA interacts with class-level learning dynamics. Using higher-quality multi-label annotations on ImageNet, we systematically categorize the affected classes and find that the majority are inherently ambiguous, co-occur, or involve fine-grained distinctions, while DA controls the model's bias towards one of the closely related classes. While many of the previously reported performance drops are explained by multi-label annotations, our analysis of class confusions reveals other sources of accuracy degradation. We show that simple class-conditional augmentation strategies informed by our framework improve performance on the negatively affected classes.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2023.

Builds on

59 of 76 references.

References · 59

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,043
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,223
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,476
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,707
  6. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,426
  7. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,457
  8. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,170
  9. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,574
  10. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,563
  11. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,266
  12. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,242
38 more
  1. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 730
  2. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 566
  3. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  4. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 391
  5. 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 331
  6. 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 249
  7. 2019Fast AutoAugmentcited by 243
  8. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 227
  9. 2019Fixing the train-test resolution discrepancycited by 209
  10. 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
  11. 2016Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American Englishcited by 196
  12. 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 169
  13. 2019Population Based Augmentation: Efficient Learning of Augmentation Policy Schedulescited by 153
  14. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 149
  15. 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
  16. 2021Re-labeling ImageNet: from Single to Multi-Labels, from Global to Localized Labelscited by 118
  17. 2019Faster AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies using Backpropagationcited by 96
  18. 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Image Augmentation Techniques for Deep Learningcited by 95
  19. 2017Learning to Compose Domain-Specific Transformations for Data Augmentationcited by 91
  20. 2020From ImageNet to Image Classification: Contextualizing Progress on Benchmarkscited by 90
  21. 2022The Effects of Regularization and Data Augmentation are Class Dependentcited by 67
  22. 2022When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNetcited by 61
  23. 2020DADA: Differentiable Automatic Data Augmentationcited by 57
  24. 2023FFCV: Accelerating Training by Removing Data Bottleneckscited by 49
  25. 2022On Uncertainty, Tempering, and Data Augmentation in Bayesian Classificationcited by 46
  26. 2020Affinity and Diversity: Quantifying Mechanisms of Data Augmentationcited by 45
  27. 2022ID and OOD Performance Are Sometimes Inversely Correlated on Real-world Datasetscited by 44
  28. 2022ImageNet-X: Understanding Model Mistakes with Factor of Variation Annotationscited by 44
  29. 2022How Much Data Are Augmentations Worth? An Investigation into Scaling Laws, Invariance, and Implicit Regularizationcited by 40
  30. 2022ModelDiff: A Framework for Comparing Learning Algorithmscited by 30
  31. 2021Grounding inductive biases in natural images:invariance stems from variations in datacited by 26
  32. 2015Dreaming More Data: Class-dependent Distributions over Diffeomorphisms for Learned Data Augmentationcited by 24
  33. 2022Bugs in the Data: How ImageNet Misrepresents Biodiversitycited by 24
  34. 2022The good, the bad and the ugly sides of data augmentation: An implicit spectral regularization perspectivecited by 24
  35. 2022When does Bias Transfer in Transfer Learning?cited by 23
  36. 2019Further advantages of data augmentation on convolutional neural networkscited by 19
  37. 2020MetaAugment: Sample-Aware Data Augmentation Policy Learningcited by 19
  38. 2022Deconstructing Distributions: A Pointwise Framework of Learningcited by 19

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: