mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Memory Contagion: Cross-Temporal Propagation of Evaluator Bias via Agent Memory

arXiv 2606.23195 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on memory systems to maintain long-term coherence. Recent work shows that agent memories degrade during continuous consolidation. However, existing research assumes memories are derived from unbiased experiences. In this work, we identify and formalize a novel phenomenon: Memory Contagion -- the cross-temporal propagation of evaluator bias through agent memory. We show that when agents are trained or guided by biased evaluators, their experiences become biased; when these trajectories are stored and consolidated into memory, the bias propagates to future agents retrieving from the same memory store, even when consolidation is perfect (oracle). Across two bias types (length preference, authority bias) and four experimental phases, we demonstrate: (1) Memory Contagion occurs for length bias even with perfect consolidation on older models (Gamma_A = 13.18, DeepSeek V4-Chat), while newer models (V4-Pro, Claude) are immune, proving both that biased input is a sufficient cause and that contagion is model-generation-dependent; (2) authority bias fails to propagate in all 15 controlled multi-seed experiments (Gamma_A = 0.00), revealing that not all evaluator biases can cross temporal boundaries through current memory architectures; (3) No observed safe threshold: length bias propagation is detected at contamination rates as low as p=0.2. Our findings expose a critical but contingent vulnerability in current agent memory designs and provide formal tools for measuring cross-temporal bias propagation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.

Builds on

8 of 19 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Useful Memories Become Faulty When Continuously Updated by LLMs13 May

Other references · 7

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  4. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  5. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  6. 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
  7. 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025How Memory Management Impacts LLM Agents: An Empirical Study of Experience-Following Behavior
  2. 2026Memory for Autonomous LLM Agents:Mechanisms, Evaluation, and Emerging Frontiers
  3. 2026Controllable Memory Usage: Balancing Anchoring and Innovation in Long-Term Human-Agent Interaction
  4. 2026How Implicit Bias Accumulates and Propagates in LLM Long-term Memory
  5. 2026Understanding and Mitigating Inference-Time Overreliance Using Agentic Memory
  6. 2026MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks
  7. 2025Memory in the Age of AI Agents
  8. 2026What to Keep, What to Forget: A Rate--Distortion View of Memory Compaction in LLMs and Agents