The Privacy Funnel from the viewpoint of Local Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a database vecX = (X1,cdots,Xn) containing the data of n users. The data aggregator wants to publicise the database, but wishes to sanitise the dataset to hide sensitive data Si correlated to Xi. This setting is considered in the Privacy Funnel, which uses mutual information as a leakage metric. The downsides to this approach are that mutual information does not give worst-case guarantees, and that finding optimal sanitisation protocols can be computationally prohibitive. We tackle these problems by using differential privacy metrics, and by considering local protocols which operate on one entry at a time. We show that under both the Local Differential Privacy and Local Information Privacy leakage metrics, one can efficiently obtain optimal protocols; however, Local Information Privacy is both more closely aligned to the privacy requirements of the Privacy Funnel scenario, and more efficiently computable. We also consider the scenario where each user has multiple attributes (i.e. Xi = (X1i,cdots,Xmi)), for which we define Side-channel Resistant Local Information Privacy, and we give efficient methods to find protocols satisfying this criterion while still offering good utility. Exploratory experiments confirm the validity of these methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.