mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MapReason-OSM: Can Vision-Language Models Make Graph-Verifiable Mobility Decisions from Street Maps ?

arXiv 2606.22597 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used to read maps for logistics, delivery, and accessible navigation, where the output is an actionable decision (a route, a pin, a parking choice) that must respect the road network. Yet most map benchmarks grade free text or multiple-choice answers that cannot be verified against the underlying graph. We present MapReason-OSM, a benchmark and evaluation harness for graph-verifiable mobility decisions on self-rendered OpenStreetMap panels. We render fixed-style maps for ten U.S. downtowns at two aligned zoom scales, overlay a consistent marker grammar, and pair each panel with a hidden street graph and exact oracles, yielding 6,000 instances (12,000 panels across the two zooms) over 12 routing, facility-location, and visual disambiguation tasks. Models return structured decisions that we snap back to the graph and score for validity, legality, optimality, and constraint satisfaction, plus cross-zoom consistency. Across seven VLMs, models read maps and route simply but fail at graph cost reasoning (single-facility pin placement is near chance even for frontier reasoning models), and are frequently scale-inconsistent. We release the benchmark, harness, and deterministic generator. Code and data: https://github.com/Vi-Sri/mapreason-osm

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.

Builds on

8 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026MapTab: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Long-Horizon Multi-Criteria Multimodal Reasoning on Heterogeneous Topological Graphs20 Feb

Other references · 7

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
  3. 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 872
  4. 2023GPT4GEO: How a Language Model Sees the World's Geographycited by 68
  5. 2025Can Large Vision Language Models Read Maps Like a Human?cited by 30
  6. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models on Spatial Tasks: A Multi-Task Benchmarking Studycited by 12
  7. 2026MobilityBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Route-Planning Agents in Real-World Mobility Scenarioscited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Understanding the Geospatial Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs: A Trajectory Recovery Perspective
  2. 2026GROKE: Vision-Free Navigation Instruction Evaluation via Graph Reasoning on OpenStreetMap
  3. 2026PlanBench-V: A Spatial Planning Map Benchmark for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2024MapEval: A Map-Based Evaluation of Geo-Spatial Reasoning in Foundation Models
  5. 2026m2sv: A Scalable Benchmark for Map-to-Street-View Spatial Reasoning
  6. 2025RoadBench: Benchmarking MLLMs on Fine-Grained Spatial Understanding and Reasoning under Urban Road Scenarios
  7. 2025Eyes Will Shut: A Vision-Based Next GPS Location Prediction Model by Reinforcement Learning from Visual Map Feed Back
  8. 2026TRIP-Evaluate: An Open Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Models in Transportation