mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GROKE: Vision-Free Navigation Instruction Evaluation via Graph Reasoning on OpenStreetMap

arXiv 2601.07375 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

The evaluation of navigation instructions remains a persistent challenge in Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) research. Traditional reference-based metrics such as BLEU and ROUGE fail to capture the functional utility of spatial directives, specifically whether an instruction successfully guides a navigator to the intended destination. Although existing VLN agents could serve as evaluators, their reliance on high-fidelity visual simulators introduces licensing constraints and computational costs, and perception errors further confound linguistic quality assessment. This paper introduces GROKE(Graph-based Reasoning over OSM Knowledge for instruction Evaluation), a vision-free training-free hierarchical LLM-based framework for evaluating navigation instructions using OpenStreetMap data. Through systematic ablation studies, we demonstrate that structured JSON and textual formats for spatial information substantially outperform grid-based and visual graph representations. Our hierarchical architecture combines sub-instruction planning with topological graph navigation, reducing navigation error by 68.5% compared to heuristic and sampling baselines on the Map2Seq dataset. The agent's execution success, trajectory fidelity, and decision patterns serve as proxy metrics for functional navigability given OSM-visible landmarks and topology, establishing a scalable and interpretable evaluation paradigm without visual dependencies. Code and data are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/groke.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2026.

Builds on

8 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Exploring Spatial Representation to Enhance LLM Reasoning in Aerial Vision-Language Navigation11 Oct

Other references · 7

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environmentscited by 1,354
  3. 2018On Evaluation of Embodied Navigation Agentscited by 526
  4. 2020Room-Across-Room: Multilingual Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dense Spatiotemporal Groundingcited by 401
  5. 2019General Evaluation for Instruction Conditioned Navigation using Dynamic Time Warpingcited by 102
  6. 2020Retouchdown: Adding Touchdown to StreetLearn as a Shareable Resource for Language Grounding Tasks in Street Viewcited by 18
  7. 2025Clutter-Robust Vision-Language-Action Models through Object-Centric and Geometry Groundingcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Fine-Grained Instruction-Guided Graph Reasoning for Vision-and-Language Navigation
  2. 2026MapReason-OSM: Can Vision-Language Models Make Graph-Verifiable Mobility Decisions from Street Maps ?
  3. 2026Beyond Spatial Benchmarks: From Spatial Reasoning to Navigation
  4. 2024Open-Nav: Exploring Zero-Shot Vision-and-Language Navigation in Continuous Environment with Open-Source LLMs
  5. 2024Mobility VLA: Multimodal Instruction Navigation with Long-Context VLMs and Topological Graphs
  6. 2026VCN-Bench: A Video-Contextualized Navigation Benchmark for Spatial Reasoning over Prior Visual Experience
  7. 2025GoViG: Goal-Conditioned Visual Navigation Instruction Generation via Multimodal Reasoning
  8. 2025Can Large Vision Language Models Read Maps Like a Human?