Projection-Volume Fidelity Divergence: Diagnosing and Controlling Optimization Drift in Sparse-View 3D Gaussian Tomography
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse-view computed tomography is a severely ill-posed inverse problem, where recent 3D Gaussian Splatting methods offer an efficient explicit representation for tomographic reconstruction. However, we find that projection-domain optimization can be misleading in this setting: the rendered projections may continue to improve while the reconstructed volume deteriorates. We identify this failure mode as Projection-Volume Fidelity Divergence (PVFD), a representation-level optimization drift caused by anisotropic Gaussian deformation and view-specific primitive co-adaptation under sparse Radon constraints. To characterize this behavior, we introduce geometry- and volume-level diagnostics that measure needle-like Gaussian degeneration and the stability of the voxelized density field. Based on these observations, we propose LADES, a ground-truth-free optimization controller for sparse-view Gaussian tomography. LADES combines Linearly Annealed Dropout, which applies strong stochastic masking in early training to disrupt premature primitive co-adaptation and gradually restores full capacity for structural consolidation, with Structure-Aware Early Stopping, which terminates densification according to the saturation of Gaussian population growth rather than validation PSNR. Experiments on sparse-view CT reconstruction show that LADES improves volumetric fidelity, suppresses structural degeneration, and substantially reduces training time while maintaining competitive projection accuracy. These results suggest that robust Gaussian-based tomography requires monitoring and controlling volumetric structure, rather than optimizing projection fit alone.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.
Builds on
9 of 23 references.
References · 9
- 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,226
- 2022NAF: Neural Attenuation Fields for Sparse-View CBCT Reconstructioncited by 108
- 2024R2-Gaussian: Rectifying Radiative Gaussian Splatting for Tomographic Reconstructioncited by 67
- 2025DropGaussian: Structural Regularization for Sparse-view Gaussian Splattingcited by 65
- 2024Radiative Gaussian Splatting for Efficient X-ray Novel View Synthesiscited by 58
- 2018Deep-neural-network based sinogram synthesis for sparse-view CT image reconstructioncited by 47
- 2025DropoutGS: Dropping Out Gaussians for Better Sparse-view Renderingcited by 29
- 2024DDGS-CT: Direction-Disentangled Gaussian Splatting for Realistic Volume Renderingcited by 23
- 2025GR-Gaussian: Graph-Based Radiative Gaussian Splatting for Sparse-View CT Reconstructioncited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.