mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Specificity- and Calibration-Aware Breast Ultrasound Segmentation via Entropy-Guided Boundary Supervision

arXiv 2606.22308 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2026eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Lesion segmentation in breast ultrasound involves two related challenges. In images with lesions, speckle noise, low tissue contrast, and posterior acoustic shadowing cause boundary leakage and incomplete contour delineation. In images without lesions, those same artifacts generate false-positive activations in regions resembling solid lesion tissue. This study addresses both failure modes through a single modification to the training objective. Rather than weighting every boundary pixel equally, the proposed loss scales contour penalties by per-pixel predictive entropy and the ground-truth boundary map, concentrating gradient emphasis on lesion margin locations where the network remains uncertain. The loss was evaluated on the BUSI dataset through a controlled ablation against two baselines: a model without boundary supervision and a model with uniformly weighted boundary binary cross-entropy. Across 97 lesion-containing test images, mean Dice scores were statistically indistinguishable between the proposed method and the no-boundary baseline (0.7624 versus 0.7616, paired Wilcoxon p = 0.27), confirming that lesion segmentation quality is preserved. The primary effect appears in specificity. False-positive activations on 20 no-lesion test images fell from 14 of 20 and 19 of 20 for the two baselines to 5 of 20 with the proposed approach (McNemar p = 0.012 and 0.0005). Non-overlapping Wilson 95% confidence intervals confirm the difference is both statistically significant and practically substantial. A post-hoc spatial temperature scaling step further reduced expected calibration error from 0.0201 to 0.0095 without altering segmentation masks. Entropy-guided boundary supervision and spatial calibration thus function as complementary training-level and inference-level refinements that improve specificity and probability reliability within a U-Net framework.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.

Builds on

26 of 59 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  6. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
  7. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,518
  8. 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,420
  9. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  10. 2021Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,218
  11. 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 577
  12. 2018End-to-End Multi-Task Learning with Attentioncited by 533
14 more
  1. 2017A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networkscited by 510
  2. 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 371
  3. 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 258
  4. 2017Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3D fully convolutional deep networkscited by 228
  5. 2018Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentationcited by 187
  6. 2019Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Resultscited by 164
  7. 2019Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentationcited by 162
  8. 2019Reducing the Hausdorff Distance in Medical Image Segmentation with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 116
  9. 2020Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibrationcited by 95
  10. 2016Semantic Segmentation using Adversarial Networkscited by 73
  11. 2015A Combined Deep-Learning and Deformable-Model Approach to Fully Automatic Segmentation of the Left Ventricle in Cardiac MRIcited by 21
  12. 2023Boundary Difference Over Union Loss For Medical Image Segmentationcited by 13
  13. 2024Sparse Bayesian Networks: Efficient Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Analysiscited by 8
  14. 2023Multilevel Perception Boundary-guided Network for Breast Lesion Segmentation in Ultrasound Imagescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.