Can LLMs Control Readability? A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Framework for CEFR-Controlled Arabic Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate fluent Arabic text, their ability to reliably control readability levels remains unclear. We propose a multi-dimensional evaluation framework for Common European Framework of Reference for Language (CEFR)-controlled Arabic text generation, assessing whether instruction-following LLMs can serve as reliable generators for adaptive language learning. Our framework integrates controlled prompting, automatic readability prediction using a validated Taha-19 model, lexical constraint validation, and syntactic complexity profiling. Results show that structured prompting substantially improves CEFR alignment. In particular, CEFR-guided prompting with lexical constraints achieves the highest conformity to reference linguistic profiles (0.91 cosine similarity) and near-perfect agreement with predicted readability levels (0.99), while unconstrained prompting exhibits weak control. These findings establish an empirical foundation for integrating readability-aware Arabic text generation into adaptive educational systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2026.
Builds on
8 of 19 references.
References · 8
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2019Text Readability Assessment for Second Language Learnerscited by 54
- 2023Generating Summaries with Controllable Readability Levelscited by 24
- 2023ReadMe++: Benchmarking Multilingual Language Models for Multi-Domain Readability Assessmentcited by 19
- 2024Measuring and Modifying the Readability of English Texts with GPT-4cited by 10
- 2025A Large and Balanced Corpus for Fine-grained Arabic Readability Assessmentcited by 8
- 2021Automatic Difficulty Classification of Arabic Sentencescited by 5
- 2025Enhancing Arabic Automated Essay Scoring with Synthetic Data and Error Injectioncited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.