Finite-Sample Performance of Gradient Descent in Logistic Regression with Gaussian Design
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the parameter estimation problem in logistic regression with Gaussian design: the estimation of a fixed unknown parameter θ^*∈ ℝd (|θ^*|2≥ 1) from n i.i.d. samples (xi,yi)i=1n, where xi~ N(0,Id) and yi|xi ~ rm Bernoulli(1/(1+exp(-xi^top θ^*))). Our main aim is to characterize the finite-sample estimation performance and convergence behavior of gradient descent (GD) on the maximum likelihood objective (i.e., the logistic loss). Under small O(1) stepsize and 0 initialization, we show that GD linearly converges to a small neighborhood of θ^* achieving an ℓ2 error of order O(√|θ^*|25d/n). This substantially goes beyond existing theoretical results that lack non-asymptotic estimation error rate and exhibit much slower parameter convergence. We also establish a faster local linear convergence to the same statistical error under a large Theta(|θ^*|2) stepsize. The main technical component is to show that the gradient of the logistic loss satisfies a certain approximate invertibility condition (AIC). To that end, we uniformly control the deviation of the gradient from its population counterpart by covering and peeling arguments, and then show that the population GD is a contraction by a delicate analysis based on the eigenvalues of population Hessian matrices. Finally, we build upon the recent work Matsumoto and Mazumdar (2025) and devise a novel efficient estimator that attains a sharper rate in high dimensions. This indicates that the existing non-asymptotic guarantees exhibit sub-optimal dependence on |θ^*|2, and that in many regimes Theta(√|θ^*|2d/n) is the tight estimation error rate. Numerical examples are provided to corroborate our theoretical results.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.
Builds on
18 of 40 references.
References · 18
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 413
- 2018Convergence of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 108
- 2013Phase Retrieval using Alternating Minimizationcited by 58
- 2018The phase transition for the existence of the maximum likelihood estimate in high-dimensional logistic regressioncited by 45
- 2023Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Logistic Regression at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 42
- 2024Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Logistic Loss: Non-Monotonicity of the Loss Improves Optimization Efficiencycited by 34
- 2023On the sample complexity of parameter estimation in logistic regression with normal designcited by 13
- 2022Binary Iterative Hard Thresholding Converges with Optimal Number of Measurements for 1-Bit Compressed Sensingcited by 9
- 2024Gradient Descent on Logistic Regression with Non-Separable Data and Large Step Sizescited by 9
- 2014Model selection and minimax estimation in generalized linear modelscited by 7
- 2023Gradient Descent Converges Linearly for Logistic Regression on Separable Datacited by 7
6 more
- 2025Large Stepsizes Accelerate Gradient Descent for Regularized Logistic Regressioncited by 7
- 2024From Logistic Regression to the Perceptron Algorithm: Exploring Gradient Descent with Large Step Sizescited by 5
- 2024Finite-sample performance of the maximum likelihood estimator in logistic regressioncited by 4
- 2025Learning sparse generalized linear models with binary outcomes via iterative hard thresholdingcited by 4
- 2025Gradient Descent on Logistic Regression: Do Large Step-Sizes Work with Data on the Sphere?cited by 2
- 2025Low-Rank Tensor Estimation from Nonlinear Observations: A Unified Frameworkcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.