Contagion Networks: Evaluator Preference Propagation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
When large language models serve as evaluators in multi-agent systems, their strategy preferences -- whether induced by explicit prompts or by shared architectural priors -- propagate through the agent network. We introduce Contagion Networks, a formal framework for measuring how evaluator preferences spread across interacting LLM agents. In a controlled 3-agent experiment using DeepSeek-chat with three distinct evaluator preference profiles (structured, balanced, evidence-based), we measure the Cross-Agent Contagion Matrix Gamma_3 and find that preferences consistently propagate between agents (gamma in [0.157, 0.352]). A neutral-prompt control experiment reveals a counter-intuitive result: shared architectural priors dominate explicit preference prompts as the driver of contagion (rho_neutral = 1.498 vs. rho_mixed = 1.299; prompt contribution: -63.5%). We identify three propagation regimes governed by the spectral radius rho(Gamma_N) and demonstrate that the same agents suppress preference contagion in chain topology (beta_3 = 0.0126 +/- 0.0038, 95% CI [0.0089, 0.0163], n=4 seeds) but cascade in fully-connected topology (Delta H_avg = -0.020) -- a topology-dependent regime transition validated both for homogeneous and cross-model agent pools (rho^cross = 1.296 +/- 0.016, n=4). We show that increasing evaluator committee size from k=1 to k=3 reduces effective contagion by 68.9% +/- 14.1% (n=4 seeds), providing an actionable mitigation strategy. We release the open-source Contagion Network experimental framework.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.
Builds on
14 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents22 Aug
- 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors21 Aug
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate14 Aug
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework1 Aug
Other references · 10
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
- 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 919
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
- 2014Epidemic processes in complex networkscited by 58
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Calibrating the Evaluator: Does Probability Calibration Mitigate Preference Coupling in LLM Agent Feedback Loops?
- 2026Conformity Dynamics in LLM Multi-Agent Systems: The Roles of Topology and Self-Social Weighting
- 2026EPC: A Standardized Protocol for Measuring Evaluator Preference Dynamics in LLM Agent Systems
- 2026Memory Contagion: Cross-Temporal Propagation of Evaluator Bias via Agent Memory
- 2026Choosing LLMs for Strategic Agent Interactions
- 2026Competition and Cooperation of LLM Agents in Games
- 2026ValueFlow: Measuring the Propagation of Value Perturbations in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- 2026Step-Level Preference Learning for Generative Agents in Social Simulations