MorphStrata: Layer-Specific Perturbations for Generating Morphence Students in Time-Series Moving Target Defense
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Time-series forecasting models remain vulnerable to gradient-based adversarial attacks while existing defense mechanisms typically incur a trade-off in robustness for bounded response and compute cost. The problem is pronounced in Moving Target Defense where maintaining multiple randomized model instances substantially exacerbates the training overhead. In this work, we introduce MorphStrata, a student generation strategy with selective, layer-specific stochastic noise injection that extends the traditional Morphence defense. MorphStrata uses a Transformer backbone as the teacher and perturbs randomly selected architectural blocks to create structured heterogeneity across student models in response to varied data distributions and threat models. We evaluate against vanilla Transformer and Morphence backbones on a suite of benchmarks including the Jena Climate, Electricity Load Diagrams, and Appliances Energy Prediction using FGSM, BIM and PGD attacks across multiple attack strengths. Across datasets and attack regimes, the proposed ensemble maintains comparable adversarial RMSE. Specifically, for high entropy, periodic datasets as in the case of the AEP data, MorphStrata achieves the lowest RMSE across all attacks and perturbation budgets, improving over the static baseline by up to 24.11% and 97.97% under FGSM and BIM respectively at an epsilon value of 0.5 over 30 randomized trials. Targeting the layers to generate MorphStrata students accounts for less than 1% increase in train-times over the Morphence MTD baseline for most of the experiments, while accounting for double digit gains in adversarial RMSE reduction. We also observe a positive correlation between higher pairwise L2 distance (among generated students) and overall defense effectiveness. In summary, MorphStrata maintains adversarial robustness as an MTD defense at marginal cost deltas when compared to existing baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.
Builds on
17 of 20 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 2,039
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 497
- 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 269
- 2024RobustTSF: Towards Theory and Design of Robust Time Series Forecasting with Anomaliescited by 18
- 2020Benchmarking adversarial attacks and defenses for time-series datacited by 9
- 2021Morphence: Moving Target Defense Against Adversarial Examplescited by 9
5 more
- 2023Targeted Attacks on Timeseries Forecastingcited by 8
- 2024Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Multivariate Time-Series Forecasting for Smart and Connected Infrastructurescited by 3
- 2018Detecting Adversarial Examples via Key-based Networkcited by 2
- 2022Morphence-2.0: Evasion-Resilient Moving Target Defense Powered by Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 2
- 2025Are Time-Series Foundation Models Deployment-Ready? A Systematic Study of Adversarial Robustness Across Domainscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.