Benchmarking adversarial attacks and defenses for time-series data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The adversarial vulnerability of deep networks has spurred the interest of researchers worldwide. Unsurprisingly, like images, adversarial examples also translate to time-series data as they are an inherent weakness of the model itself rather than the modality. Several attempts have been made to defend against these adversarial attacks, particularly for the visual modality. In this paper, we perform detailed benchmarking of well-proven adversarial defense methodologies on time-series data. We restrict ourselves to the L∞ threat model. We also explore the trade-off between smoothness and clean accuracy for regularization-based defenses to better understand the trade-offs that they offer. Our analysis shows that the explored adversarial defenses offer robustness against both strong white-box as well as black-box attacks. This paves the way for future research in the direction of adversarial attacks and defenses, particularly for time-series data.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2025TabAttackBench: A Benchmark for Adversarial Attacks on Tabular Datacited by 4
- 2023On the Susceptibility and Robustness of Time Series Models through Adversarial Attack and Defensecited by 3
- 2025Are Time-Series Foundation Models Deployment-Ready? A Systematic Study of Adversarial Robustness Across Domainscited by 2
- 2025ReLATE: Resilient Learner Selection for Multivariate Time-Series Classification Against Adversarial Attackscited by 1
- 2023The race to robustness: exploiting fragile models for urban camouflage and the imperative for machine learning securitycited by 0
- 2024Correlation Analysis of Adversarial Attack in Time Series Classificationcited by 0
- 2024Boosting Certified Robustness for Time Series Classification with Efficient Self-Ensemblecited by 0
- 2026MorphStrata: Layer-Specific Perturbations for Generating Morphence Students in Time-Series Moving Target Defensecited by 0
- 2026LogiC-Diff: Embedding Security Properties Into AI-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 0
- 2026LogiC-Diff: Embedding Security Properties Into AI-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems29 Sep 2026
- 2026MorphStrata: Layer-Specific Perturbations for Generating Morphence Students in Time-Series Moving Target Defense16 Jun 2026
- 2025TabAttackBench: A Benchmark for Adversarial Attacks on Tabular Data27 May 2025
- 2025Are Time-Series Foundation Models Deployment-Ready? A Systematic Study of Adversarial Robustness Across Domains26 May 2025
- 2025ReLATE: Resilient Learner Selection for Multivariate Time-Series Classification Against Adversarial Attacks10 Mar 2025
- 2024Boosting Certified Robustness for Time Series Classification with Efficient Self-Ensemble4 Sep 2024
- 2024Correlation Analysis of Adversarial Attack in Time Series Classification21 Aug 2024
- 2023The race to robustness: exploiting fragile models for urban camouflage and the imperative for machine learning security26 Jun 2023
- 2023On the Susceptibility and Robustness of Time Series Models through Adversarial Attack and Defense9 Jan 2023