mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sensor-Conditioned Representation Learning via Scene-Relevant Observation Quotients

arXiv 2606.16210 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learned representations in intelligent sensing systems are often evaluated by reconstruction fidelity or downstream prediction accuracy, but these criteria do not specify which latent distinctions are justified by the sensing process. In sensor-conditioned environments, nuisance factors can change measurements without changing the scene, while distinct scenes may be indistinguishable under limited sensing capability. This paper formulates sensor-conditioned representation correctness as preserving sensing-supported scene distinctions while suppressing nuisance-induced and sensor-unsupported variation. We introduce the scene-relevant observation quotient, a representation target induced by sensing-supported distinguishability after nuisance canonicalization, and develop Observation-Quotient Tucker-Structured Autoencoding (OQ-TSAE), a scene-nuisance factorized framework with diagnostics for false distinction, false merge, nuisance sensitivity, and latent ordering consistency. Experiments on a controlled benchmark show that quotient-consistent supervision improves representation-correctness diagnostics over reconstruction-oriented, metric-learning, and contrastive-learning baselines. Sensitivity, perturbation, and ablation studies show the importance of quotient-aligned supervision, reliable quotient relations, and quotient geometry. Complementary real-radar experiments show that a reconstruction-only OQ-TSAE variant retains competitive downstream utility, robustness under observation degradation, and low seed-to-seed variability. These results suggest that sensor-conditioned representations should be evaluated not only by predictive utility, but also by whether their latent geometry preserves sensing-justified scene distinctions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2026.

Builds on

13 of 36 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  3. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  4. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  5. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
  6. 2016InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Netscited by 858
  7. 2019Deep Multi-modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challengescited by 313
  8. 2021Integrated Sensing and Communications: Towards Dual-functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyondcited by 88
  9. 2021RadarScenes: A Real-World Radar Point Cloud Data Set for Automotive Applicationscited by 61
  10. 2020CARRADA Dataset: Camera and Automotive Radar with Range-Angle-Doppler Annotationscited by 60
  11. 2021Robust Representation Learning via Perceptual Similarity Metricscited by 23
  12. 2023A New Wave in Robotics: Survey on Recent mmWave Radar Applications in Roboticscited by 18
1 more
  1. 2014Measurement partitioning and observational equivalence in state estimationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.