CODA-BENCH: Can Code Agents Handle Data-Intensive Tasks?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Advanced agents are increasingly demonstrating the potential to operate as autonomous engineers, creating a growing demand for evaluation benchmarks that capture the complexity of real-world development. Such environments typically involve both complex code and large-scale data (i.e., file system). However, existing benchmarks usually evaluate code-centric or data-centric capabilities in isolation, leaving a clear gap with real development scenarios. In this paper, we bridge this gap by introducing CODA-BENCH, the first benchmark to jointly evaluate code and data intelligence in a data-intensive environment. We construct a data-intensive Linux sandbox based on the Kaggle ecosystem (containing hundreds of datasets), where agents must actively explore complex file hierarchies to identify relevant resources and generate code for data-driven analytical tasks. CODA-BENCH comprises 1,009 tasks spanning 31 communities, with each task environment containing an average of 980 files, simulating realistic data scale and noise. Evaluations of advanced agents reveal that even top-performing systems struggle to effectively integrate data discovery with code execution, achieving a success rate of only 61.1%. These results highlight a substantial gap in current agentic capabilities for data-intensive tasks and point to promising directions for future research.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2026.
Builds on
39 of 47 references.
References · 39
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,808
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,267
- 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,242
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,195
- 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,181
27 more
- 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
- 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 1,002
- 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
- 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
- 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 688
- 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 562
- 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
- 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 515
- 2025Humanity's Last Examcited by 491
- 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 469
- 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 452
- 2018From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communitiescited by 385
- 2020HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Datacited by 264
- 2024SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?cited by 203
- 2021FeTaQA: Free-form Table Question Answeringcited by 175
- 2025Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolvingcited by 171
- 2020Open Question Answering over Tables and Textcited by 163
- 2024DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts?cited by 125
- 2022MultiHiertt: Numerical Reasoning over Multi Hierarchical Tabular and Textual Datacited by 121
- 2024DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Modelscited by 109
- 2024DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 58
- 2025DataSciBench: An LLM Agent Benchmark for Data Sciencecited by 57
- 2025KramaBench: A Benchmark for AI Systems on Data-to-Insight Pipelines over Data Lakescited by 33
- 2025DAComp: Benchmarking Data Agents across the Full Data Intelligence Lifecyclecited by 23
- 2024TQA-Bench: Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Table Question Answeringcited by 17
- 2025DSCodeBench: A Realistic Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026EvoCode-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents in Multi-Turn Iterative Interactions
- 2025GitTaskBench: A Benchmark for Code Agents Solving Real-World Tasks Through Code Repository Leveraging
- 2025NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents
- 2026"Skill Issues'': Data-Centric Optimization of Lakehouse Agents
- 2025SWE-PolyBench: A multi-language benchmark for repository level evaluation of coding agents
- 2026ProjDevBench: Benchmarking AI Coding Agents on End-to-End Project Development
- 2026PERFOPT-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents on Software Performance Optimization
- 2026ABC-Bench: Benchmarking Agentic Backend Coding in Real-World Development