mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Physics-conforming Latent Twins

arXiv 2606.15053 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Surrogate models are central to scientific machine learning, where they enable fast prediction, simulation, inference, and control for complex physical systems. For time-dependent problems, however, accurate interpolation of training trajectories is not sufficient: reliable surrogates should also respect the conservation laws, invariants, admissibility conditions, and dissipative structures that give those trajectories physical meaning. We introduce Physics-conforming Latent Twins, a framework for learning latent surrogate solution operators whose dynamics satisfy selected physical principles by design. The method builds on the Latent Twin formulation by jointly learning an encoder, a decoder, and a latent flow map between arbitrary time-indexed states, while constraining the latent dynamics to preserve or dissipate prescribed structural quantities. We develop a constraint-transfer viewpoint that connects physical structure in the original state space with compatible constraints in latent space, and prove structure-preservation bounds showing how latent enforcement improves control of physical defects after decoding. We also derive algebraic conditions for latent flow maps that preserve linear and quadratic invariants or enforce dissipative inequalities. Numerical experiments on representative ODE and PDE benchmarks demonstrate improved constraint satisfaction, structural fidelity, and qualitative long-time behavior while maintaining accurate surrogate prediction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 47 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  3. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  4. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  5. 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 491
  6. 2017Learning Koopman Invariant Subspaces for Dynamic Mode Decompositioncited by 156
  7. 2020SINDy-PI: A Robust Algorithm for Parallel Implicit Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 125
  8. 2023Operator Learning with Neural Fields: Tackling PDEs on General Geometriescited by 80
  9. 2022Continuous PDE Dynamics Forecasting with Implicit Neural Representationscited by 71
  10. 2022CROM: Continuous Reduced-Order Modeling of PDEs Using Implicit Neural Representationscited by 56
  11. 2021Machine learning structure preserving brackets for forecasting irreversible processescited by 51
  12. 2022gLaSDI: Parametric Physics-informed Greedy Latent Space Dynamics Identificationcited by 30
8 more
  1. 2024tLaSDI: Thermodynamics-informed latent space dynamics identificationcited by 23
  2. 2023Weak-Form Latent Space Dynamics Identificationcited by 20
  3. 2024GoRINNs: Godunov-Riemann Informed Neural Networks for Learning Hyperbolic Conservation Lawscited by 8
  4. 2025Thermodynamically Consistent Latent Dynamics Identification for Parametric Systemscited by 8
  5. 2024Sparse L1-Autoencoders for Scientific Data Compressioncited by 4
  6. 2024Guaranteeing Conservation Laws with Projection in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 3
  7. 2025Latent Twinscited by 3
  8. 2025Next Generation Equation-Free Multiscale Modelling of Crowd Dynamics via Machine Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.