mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Guaranteeing Conservation Laws with Projection in Physics-Informed Neural Networks

arXiv 2410.17445 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) incorporate physical laws into their training to efficiently solve partial differential equations (PDEs) with minimal data. However, PINNs fail to guarantee adherence to conservation laws, which are also important to consider in modeling physical systems. To address this, we proposed PINN-Proj, a PINN-based model that uses a novel projection method to enforce conservation laws. We found that PINN-Proj substantially outperformed PINN in conserving momentum and lowered prediction error by three to four orders of magnitude from the best benchmark tested. PINN-Proj also performed marginally better in the separate task of state prediction on three PDE datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2024.

Builds on

6 of 9 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  2. 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
  3. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 388
  4. 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 277
  5. 2022Learning differentiable solvers for systems with hard constraintscited by 34
  6. 2023ConCerNet: A Contrastive Learning Based Framework for Automated Conservation Law Discovery and Trustworthy Dynamical System Predictioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.