From Verdict to Process: Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Stage Fact Verification
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent approaches combining Large Language Models (LLMs) with retrieval-augmented reasoning have shown promise for automated fact verification. To process complex claims, these verification pipelines typically execute multi-stage workflows that coordinate tightly coupled modules, including claim decomposition, evidence gathering, and verdict prediction. However, existing methods optimize individual stages in isolation or rely on fixed heuristics, which limits adaptive coordination among stages and can lead to suboptimal outcomes. In this work, we propose ProFact, an agentic reinforcement learning framework for end-to-end optimization of multi-stage fact verification trajectories. ProFact trains a unified policy to coordinate claim decomposition, evidence seeking, answer generation, and verdict prediction. To address the sparse and delayed supervision provided by final veracity labels, ProFact introduces process-aware rewards that provide stage-level learning signals throughout the verification process. Empirical evaluation shows that ProFact consistently outperforms strong baselines in both verification performance and inference efficiency. These results highlight the effectiveness of process-aware trajectory optimization for multi-stage fact verification.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.
Builds on
17 of 23 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 16
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
- 2021A Survey on Automated Fact-Checkingcited by 376
- 2025RAGEN: Understanding Self-Evolution in LLM Agents via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 357
- 2023Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Bettercited by 205
- 2019MultiFC: A Real-World Multi-Domain Dataset for Evidence-Based Fact Checking of Claimscited by 169
- 2023AVeriTeC: A Dataset for Real-world Claim Verification with Evidence from the Webcited by 144
- 2018The Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) Shared Taskcited by 108
4 more
- 2023Towards LLM-based Fact Verification on News Claims with a Hierarchical Step-by-Step Prompting Methodcited by 97
- 2026Search-P1: Path-Centric Reward Shaping for Stable and Efficient Agentic RAG Trainingcited by 15
- 2024HerO at AVeriTeC: The Herd of Open Large Language Models for Verifying Real-World Claimscited by 12
- 2025Debating Truth: Debate-driven Claim Verification with Multiple Large Language Model Agentscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026EAVer: Long-Form Factuality Verification as an End-to-End Agentic Policy
- 2025Veri-R1: Toward Precise and Faithful Claim Verification via Online Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Verified Critical Step Optimization for LLM Agents
- 2026MAS-ProVe: Understanding the Process Verification of Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Verifiable Process Rewards for Agentic Reasoning
- 2026Distill and Align Decomposition for Enhanced Claim Verification
- 2026DARE: Dialectical Agentic Reasoning for Structured Knowledge Fact Checking
- 2026Courtroom-Style Multi-Agent Debate with Progressive RAG and Role-Switching for Controversial Claim Verification