LLM-Powered Personalized Glycemic Assessment in Type 2 Diabetes with Wearable Sensor Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) poses an increasing global health threat, demanding effective glycemic assessment to support personalized and improved diabetes care. Wearable sensors such as continuous glucose monitors (CGM) and fitness trackers offer many valuable insights for glycemic assessment. However, effectively analyzing these data requires integration with essential individual-level context. Existing methods are often based on traditional machine learning (ML) and rely primarily on historical blood glucose measurements and overlook personalized information, which limits their performance across diverse diabetes populations. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to integrate diverse data modalities while modeling sequential dependencies, motivating the exploration of their potential for personalized glycemic assessment. In this paper, we propose GlyLLM, an LLM-powered framework for modeling CGM-based glycemic dynamics through the integration of wearable sensor data and structured metadata. GlyLLM can leverage the extensive prior knowledge of pre-trained LLMs and achieve sensor-text semantic abstraction at decision time. Experiments on two related tasks on the AI-READI dataset demonstrate that our model outperforms traditional ML methods by an average of 13.66% in Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) for glucose forecasting and 13.08% in Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) for diabetes categorization. Additionally, our ablation study shows that diabetes surveys and biometric tests are more critical than other health information for glycemic assessment. Our work presents a promising step toward harnessing the power of LLMs to advance personalized glycemic assessment in T2D care.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.
Builds on
17 of 43 references.
References · 17
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 2,039
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2023iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecastingcited by 931
- 2024Are Language Models Actually Useful for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 168
- 2023Navigating Text-To-Image Customization: From LyCORIS Fine-Tuning to Model Evaluationcited by 109
- 2024Med42-v2: A Suite of Clinical LLMscited by 90
- 2023Mental-LLM: Leveraging Large Language Models for Mental Health Prediction via Online Text Datacited by 66
5 more
- 2024Health-LLM: Large Language Models for Health Prediction via Wearable Sensor Datacited by 66
- 2024Empowering Time Series Analysis with Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 60
- 2025SensorLM: Learning the Language of Wearable Sensorscited by 49
- 2025DM-Bench: Benchmarking LLMs for Personalized Decision Making in Diabetes Managementcited by 2
- 2026FedKRSO: Communication and Memory Efficient Federated Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.