mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pythagoras-Prover: Advancing Efficient Formal Proving via Augmented Lean Formalisation

arXiv 2606.12594 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern Lean theorem provers achieve strong performance only with substantial training and inference compute, driven in part by scarce verified proof data and the long reasoning traces of formal proof search, making both supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and sampling expensive. We introduce Pythagoras-Prover, a compute-efficient open-source family of Lean theorem provers built for practical compute budgets. The family spans two generation paradigms: autoregressive models at 4B and 32B parameters, and a first proof-of-concept diffusion-based prover (4B) that iteratively refines Lean proofs at inference time. For training efficiency, we build a Lean-verified corpus stratified into easy, medium, and hard problems for curriculum SFT, so models acquire proof skills progressively from shorter, simpler proofs to longer, harder ones. During SFT, a dynamic proof-reasoning filtering scheme preserves informative proof traces while keeping each instance within an 8k-token context budget. We also introduce Augmented Lean Formalisation (ALF), which expands scarce verified corpora into variants of formal statements, populated via self-distillation for extra training signal without formally verifying every mutated instance. By perturbing known problems while preserving their formal character, ALF reduces reliance on any statement's surface form. Empirically, Pythagoras-Prover-4B surpasses DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B at pass@32 on MiniF2F-Test (86.1% vs 82.4%) with ~167x fewer parameters, while Pythagoras-Prover-32B sets the open-source state of the art at 93.0% on MiniF2F-Test and solves 93 of 672 PutnamBench problems. We release MiniF2F-ALF, an ALF-mutated contamination-sensitive benchmark on which every evaluated model loses accuracy; here our 32B remains strongest and our 4B matches the prior state of the art, Goedel-Prover-V2-32B.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 47 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

47 of 62 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026FormalScience: Scalable Human-in-the-Loop Autoformalisation of Science with Agentic Code Generation in Lean24 Apr
  2. 2025Leanabell-Prover-V2: Verifier-integrated Reasoning for Formal Theorem Proving via Reinforcement Learning11 Jul
  3. 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decomposition30 Apr
  4. 2025Kimina-Prover Preview: Towards Large Formal Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learning15 Apr
  5. 2025Leanabell-Prover: Posttraining Scaling in Formal Reasoning8 Apr
  6. 2025Theorem Prover as a Judge for Synthetic Data Generation18 Feb
  7. 2025STP: Self-play LLM Theorem Provers with Iterative Conjecturing and Proving31 Jan
  8. 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking8 Jan
  9. 2024CoMAT: Chain of Mathematically Annotated Thought Improves Mathematical Reasoning14 Oct
  10. 2024Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Models10 Oct
  11. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models7 Oct
  12. 2024Lean-STaR: Learning to Interleave Thinking and Proving14 Jul
2 more
  1. 2024DART-Math: Difficulty-Aware Rejection Tuning for Mathematical Problem-Solving18 Jun
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models5 Feb

Other references · 33

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
  6. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  7. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
  8. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
  9. 2025Large Language Diffusion Modelscited by 912
  10. 2024Simple and Effective Masked Diffusion Language Modelscited by 848
  11. 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 723
  12. 2025Dream 7B: Diffusion Large Language Modelscited by 544
21 more
  1. 2025Block Diffusion: Interpolating Between Autoregressive and Diffusion Language Modelscited by 409
  2. 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 391
  3. 2024The Faiss librarycited by 376
  4. 2023Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 288
  5. 2024DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Datacited by 234
  6. 2024PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competitioncited by 165
  7. 2025Goedel-Prover-V2: Scaling Formal Theorem Proving with Scaffolded Data Synthesis and Self-Correctioncited by 154
  8. 2025Goedel-Prover: A Frontier Model for Open-Source Automated Theorem Provingcited by 133
  9. 2025Big-Math: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Math Dataset for Reinforcement Learning in Language Modelscited by 109
  10. 2025Gold-medalist Performance in Solving Olympiad Geometry with AlphaGeometry2cited by 97
  11. 2025BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Provingcited by 84
  12. 2025Defeating the Training-Inference Mismatch via FP16cited by 66
  13. 2026Embarrassingly Simple Self-Distillation Improves Code Generationcited by 40
  14. 2024Evaluating Language Models as Synthetic Data Generatorscited by 33
  15. 2025Autoformalization in the Wild: Assessing LLMs on Real-World Mathematical Definitionscited by 22
  16. 2025ReFusion: A Diffusion Large Language Model with Parallel Autoregressive Decodingcited by 18
  17. 2025Beyond Next-Token Prediction: A Performance Characterization of Diffusion versus Autoregressive Language Modelscited by 13
  18. 2025PiCSAR: Probabilistic Confidence Selection And Ranking for Reasoning Chainscited by 10
  19. 2025MASA: LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Systems for Autoformalizationcited by 6
  20. 2026Neural Theorem Proving for Verification Conditions: A Real-World Benchmarkcited by 4
  21. 2026Can I Have Your Order? Monte-Carlo Tree Search for Slot Filling Ordering in Diffusion Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Models
  2. 2025LeanProgress: Guiding Search for Neural Theorem Proving via Proof Progress Prediction
  3. 2025Seed-Prover: Deep and Broad Reasoning for Automated Theorem Proving
  4. 2026OProver: A Unified Framework for Agentic Formal Theorem Proving
  5. 2025Lean Meets Theoretical Computer Science: Scalable Synthesis of Theorem Proving Challenges in Formal-Informal Pairs
  6. 2025ProofOptimizer: Training Language Models to Simplify Proofs without Human Demonstrations
  7. 2025REAL-Prover: Retrieval Augmented Lean Prover for Mathematical Reasoning
  8. 2025APOLLO: Automated LLM and Lean Collaboration for Advanced Formal Reasoning