LeanPRM: Lean-Grounded Process Supervision for Natural Language Proof Verification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI systems now write long and difficult mathematical proofs, and checking their step-by-step validity is becoming a bottleneck. A learned verifier could check proofs cheaply, but training one requires a correctness label on every step, and such labels are hard to obtain for open-ended proofs. Existing methods take them from human annotators, which is costly, or derive them from final answers, which proofs do not have, and formalizing each proof in Lean requires expert effort. We introduce LeanPRM, a framework that uses the Lean proof assistant to create step-level labels for natural-language proofs. A model writes a natural-language proof together with a paired formal proof, without feedback from Lean. Lean then labels every step, and a second model discards failures caused only by the formal syntax, so that the negative labels mark errors in the mathematics. LeanPRM contains 10,634 proofs with 152K labeled steps and no human annotation. A Qwen3-4B verifier trained on LeanPRM raises exact step-label accuracy on a held-out set of 200 proofs (LeanPRM-Bench) from 48.2 to 74.7, as opposed to 60.3 when the same base model is trained on PRM800K. It also selects better proofs in best-of-N selection on IMO-level problems, and outperforms the PRM800K-trained verifier on three of four external verification benchmarks. Training on LeanPRM improves verifiers at every size from 0.6B to 8B parameters on LeanPRM-Bench, Hard2Verify and IMO-GradingBench. Given the labels need no human annotation, LeanPRM can grow with the supply of formal statements, offering a path to step-level feedback on AI-generated proofs that are hard for humans to check.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.
Builds on
52 of 57 references.
References · 52
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 1,017
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 928
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
- 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
38 more
- 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
- 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 427
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
- 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 391
- 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 292
- 2022Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofscited by 291
- 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decompositioncited by 287
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 279
- 2022Autoformalization with Large Language Modelscited by 263
- 2024DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Searchcited by 197
- 2023ProofNet: Autoformalizing and Formally Proving Undergraduate-Level Mathematicscited by 192
- 2025Kimina-Prover Preview: Towards Large Formal Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
- 2024PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competitioncited by 165
- 2025Goedel-Prover-V2: Scaling Formal Theorem Proving with Scaffolded Data Synthesis and Self-Correctioncited by 154
- 2024LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugscited by 147
- 2025Goedel-Prover: A Frontier Model for Open-Source Automated Theorem Provingcited by 133
- 2024Lean Workbook: A large-scale Lean problem set formalized from natural language math problemscited by 122
- 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoningcited by 102
- 2025Seed-Prover: Deep and Broad Reasoning for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 101
- 2025PRMBench: A Fine-grained and Challenging Benchmark for Process-Level Reward Modelscited by 99
- 2025DeepSeekMath-V2: Towards Self-Verifiable Mathematical Reasoningcited by 94
- 2024Prover-Verifier Games improve legibility of LLM outputscited by 85
- 2024Formal Mathematical Reasoning: A New Frontier in AIcited by 81
- 2025Towards Robust Mathematical Reasoningcited by 73
- 2024Lean-STaR: Learning to Interleave Thinking and Provingcited by 68
- 2024Herald: A Natural Language Annotated Lean 4 Datasetcited by 59
- 2025RL Tango: Reinforcing Generator and Verifier Together for Language Reasoningcited by 40
- 2021Learning to Give Checkable Answers with Prover-Verifier Gamescited by 32
- 2024AutoPSV: Automated Process-Supervised Verifiercited by 30
- 2025DeepTheorem: Advancing LLM Reasoning for Theorem Proving Through Natural Language and Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
- 2025Hard2Verify: A Step-Level Verification Benchmark for Open-Ended Frontier Mathcited by 22
- 2025Safe: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Retrospective Step-aware Formal Verificationcited by 17
- 2025Theorem Prover as a Judge for Synthetic Data Generationcited by 14
- 2025HERMES: Towards Efficient and Verifiable Mathematical Reasoning in LLMscited by 11
- 2025Efficient PRM Training Data Synthesis via Formal Verificationcited by 8
- 2026Process-Verified Reinforcement Learning for Theorem Proving via Leancited by 7
- 2026Pushing the Boundaries of Natural Reasoning: Interleaved Bonus from Formal-Logic Verificationcited by 5
- 2025LeanTutor: Towards a Verified AI Mathematical Proof Tutorcited by 4
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.