Designing AI-Supported Focus Groups: A Role x Modality Playbook
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Collecting participants' lived experiences is central to design research. Focus groups are uniquely valuable because participants not only share individual accounts but also respond to one another, surfacing comparison, disagreement, and collective sensemaking. However, focus groups are resource-intensive and highly sensitive to facilitation: moderators must probe for specificity, balance participation, manage topic flow, and sustain psychological safety, and subtle facilitation choices can shape what becomes salient. Recent HCI work and commercial meeting tools show that generative AI can scaffold live conversation through prompting, turn regulation, thematic mapping, and real-time summarization. Yet UXR teams lack a clear map of what these capabilities mean in focus groups and what methodological risks they introduce. We synthesize AI supports for live conversation and translate them into a focus-group-specific playbook organized by AI role (tool, co-host, host) and modality (text, voice, embodied).We synthesize prior work on AI-supported live conversation and propose a focus-group-specific playbook of AI supports organized by role (tool, co-host, host) and modality (text, voice, embodied). We characterize interactional trade-offs and identify open questions for evaluating AI-supported focus groups as methodological configurations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.
Builds on
11 of 40 references.
References · 11
- 2023Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 67
- 2023Ignore, Trust, or Negotiate: Understanding Clinician Acceptance of AI-Based Treatment Recommendations in Health Carecited by 37
- 2023Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: A Comparison between Process and Outcome Controlcited by 12
- 2023Summaries, Highlights, and Action items: Design, implementation and evaluation of an LLM-powered meeting recap systemcited by 12
- 2021AffectiveSpotlight: Facilitating the Communication of Affective Responses from Audience Members during Online Presentationscited by 7
- 2021Large Scale Analysis of Multitasking Behavior During Remote Meetingscited by 4
- 2024The CoExplorer Technology Probe: A Generative AI-Powered Adaptive Interface to Support Intentionality in Planning and Running Video Meetingscited by 4
- 2025Observe, Ask, Intervene: Designing AI Agents for More Inclusive Meetingscited by 4
- 2025MeetMap: Real-Time Collaborative Dialogue Mapping with LLMs in Online Meetingscited by 3
- 2025Interview AI-ssistant: Designing for Real-Time Human-AI Collaboration in Interview Preparation and Executioncited by 2
- 2021What was Hybrid? A Systematic Review of Hybrid Collaboration and Meetings Researchcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.