mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sovereign Assurance Boundary: Certificate-Bound Admission for Agentic Infrastructure

arXiv 2606.11632 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.DCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic infrastructure introduces a critical control-plane authorization problem: non-deterministic reasoning systems can propose high-stakes mutations to production resources, yet existing security mechanisms -- such as identity and access management (IAM), policy engines, consensus protocols, and audit logs -- either enforce static, context-unaware permissions or merely record actions post-execution. This paper introduces the Sovereign Assurance Boundary (SAB), a certificate-bound runtime admission layer for autonomous execution authority. SAB intercepts agent proposals at an assurance airlock, compiles them into typed execution contracts C, and binds these contracts to cryptographic evidence digests H(E) and policy versions. The contracts are then routed through consequence-aware certification paths. Upon successful admission, the system emits a signed Sovereign Assurance Certificate (Omega) that is strictly scoped to a specific execution identity, revocation epoch, and validity window. Finally, a sovereign execution broker verifies Omega and performs fresh pre-execution revocation and drift checks before invoking infrastructure APIs. We detail the airlock-broker architecture, formalize its admission and revocation invariants, and report preliminary feasibility measurements from a Go prototype evaluated over 2,500 admission attempts. Ultimately, this broker-enforced model prevents autonomous reasoning from directly mutating state, transforming delegated execution authority into a cryptographically verifiable, evidence-bound, revocable, and replayable runtime artifact.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

6 of 25 references.

References · 6

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  3. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
  4. 2015Shield Synthesis: Runtime Enforcement for Reactive Systemscited by 42
  5. 2019Neural Simplex Architecturecited by 29
  6. 2026Semantic Quorum Assurance: Collective Certification for Non-Deterministic AI Infrastructurecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Verifiable Agentic Infrastructure: Proof-Derived Authorization for Sovereign AI Systems
  2. 2026Sovereign Agentic Loops: Decoupling AI Reasoning from Execution in Real-World Systems
  3. 2026Faramesh: A Protocol-Agnostic Execution Control Plane for Autonomous Agent Systems
  4. 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
  5. 2026CONTINUITY: Security-Context Contracts for Composable LLM Agent Controls
  6. 2026Grimlock: Guarding High-Agency Systems with eBPF and Attested Channels
  7. 2026Trust Is Not a Score: Runtime Assurance Contracts for High-Risk AI Agents
  8. 2026From Intent to Execution Grant: An Execution-Boundary Conformance Profile for High-Risk AI Actions