mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

READER: Dynamic LLM Provenance from Query-Varying Interactions

arXiv 2606.10794 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing black-box LLM provenance methods achieve comparability by querying every candidate model with the same diagnostic prompts. In deployment, auditors inherit a different evidence stream: heterogeneous prompt-response traces that arrive incrementally. We formalize dynamic black-box LLM provenance: after enrolling a fixed candidate ecosystem, attribute query-varying interactions at any available evidence budget. READER recovers comparability through a frozen proxy LLM. It projects proxy states aligned with response tokens onto length-normalized DC and first-AC modes, capturing response-wide activation location and coarse trajectory evolution. An enrollment-trained linear probe converts each fingerprint into source evidence, and Bayesian accumulation reuses this evidence unit from one observation to many. We introduce Agent500, containing 50,000 responses from 100 local and API sources to 500 heterogeneous agent prompts. On 100-way attribution, READER reaches 50.4% accuracy from one response and 96.2% from 100, compared with 33.0% and 79.0% for the strongest dynamic baselines. Four distinct proxy families all exceed 94.8% at the latter budget. Controlled response-length and Math100 domain shifts expose the limits of zero-retraining transfer. Component analysis reveals a task-dependent spectral division of labor: DC dominates dynamic source identity, while first AC dominates static relationship evidence. Their joint fingerprint provides a shared measurement space for both tasks. READER audits observed text without target internals or audit-only queries. Code and data are available at https://github.com/LeoJeshua/READER.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

Builds on

4 of 33 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  2. 2026Toward Efficient Agents: Memory, Tool learning, and Planningcited by 16
  3. 2026Daily and Weekly Periodicity in Large Language Model Performance and Its Implications for Researchcited by 2
  4. 2026Provable Model Provenance Set for Large Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Auditing Provenance Sensitivity in LLM Agent Action Selection
  2. 2026ProvenanceGuard: Source-Aware Factuality Verification for MCP-Based LLM Agents
  3. 2026From Agent Traces to Trust: A Survey of Evidence Tracing and Execution Provenance in LLM Agents
  4. 2025LLM Agents for Interactive Workflow Provenance: Reference Architecture and Evaluation Methodology
  5. 2026Safeguarding LLM Agents from Misalignment through Provenance Analysis
  6. 2025LLM-driven Provenance Forensics for Threat Investigation and Detection
  7. 2026The Granularity Mismatch in Agent Security: Argument-Level Provenance Solves Enforcement and Isolates the LLM Reasoning Bottleneck
  8. 2026VeriHarness: Scaling Agentic Verification for Long-Horizon Tasks