Preserving Plasticity in Continual Learning via Dynamical Isometry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Continual training of deep neural networks under non-stationarity often leads to a progressive loss of plasticity, eventually limiting further learning. We relate plasticity to the empirical Neural Tangent Kernel, and identify dynamical isometry (the condition that layer-wise Jacobian singular values remain close to one) as a key mechanism for preserving plasticity in continual learning. We revisit a class of networks that are almost-everywhere isometric while remaining universal Lipschitz function approximators, demonstrating that near-dynamical isometry is compatible with expressive nonlinear representations. For general architectures, we propose an efficient isometry-promoting regularization scheme and identify a novel mechanism by which it can reactivate dormant ReLU units. Building on this, we introduce AdamO, an Adam-style adaptive optimizer that decouples isometry regularization from gradient updates, analogous to AdamW. We further reinterpret prior plasticity-preserving approaches through the lens of dynamical isometry, showing that they target only a partial measure of isometry. Across supervised and reinforcement-learning continual-learning benchmarks designed to induce plasticity loss, our methods consistently match or outperform existing approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
27 of 40 references.
References · 27
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
- 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 711
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 413
- 2022The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 242
- 2018Sorting out Lipschitz function approximationcited by 211
- 2018Dynamical Isometry and a Mean Field Theory of CNNs: How to Train 10,000-Layer Vanilla Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 176
- 2023The Dormant Neuron Phenomenon in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 171
15 more
- 2023Understanding plasticity in neural networkscited by 170
- 2017Resurrecting the sigmoid in deep learning through dynamical isometry: theory and practicecited by 132
- 2022Understanding and Preventing Capacity Loss in Reinforcement Learningcited by 124
- 2017L2 Regularization versus Batch and Weight Normalizationcited by 121
- 2023Loss of Plasticity in Continual Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 118
- 2024Disentangling the Causes of Plasticity Loss in Neural Networkscited by 82
- 2018The Emergence of Spectral Universality in Deep Networkscited by 74
- 2019Orthogonal Deep Neural Networkscited by 72
- 2023Maintaining Plasticity in Continual Learning via Regenerative Regularizationcited by 63
- 2024Normalization and effective learning rates in reinforcement learningcited by 55
- 2021Rapid training of deep neural networks without skip connections or normalization layers using Deep Kernel Shapingcited by 51
- 2024Learning Continually by Spectral Regularizationcited by 34
- 2020Controllable Orthogonalization in Training DNNscited by 30
- 2016Norm-preserving Orthogonal Permutation Linear Unit Activation Functions (OPLU)cited by 15
- 2025Octax: Accelerated CHIP-8 Arcade Environments for Reinforcement Learning in JAXcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Interference and Retention in Continual Learningcited by 1
- 2026Interference and Retention in Continual Learning10 Jul 2026