mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Steganography Without Modification: Hidden Communication via LLM Seeds

arXiv 2606.09135 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We demonstrate that widely deployed Large Language Model (LLM) inference stacks harbor a steganographic channel that requires no modification to model weights, sampling code, or output distributions. The channel exploits a structural property of deterministic decoding: pseudo-random number generators (PRNGs) used in inverse-transform sampling produce a seed-dependent sequence of token-level probability intervals that can be reconstructed from the generated text alone. A sender encodes a secret message in the PRNG seed before generation; a receiver reconstructs the intervals and recovers the seed, and thus the hidden payload, by exhaustive search over the seed space. We formalize two operational modes. In the known-prompt setting, sender and receiver share the prompt, enabling exact interval reconstruction and perfect seed recovery via forced alignment. In the unknown-prompt setting, only the generated text is available; approximate interval reconstruction combined with a maximum-hit-count scoring strategy still permits reliable recovery from sufficiently long outputs. Extensive experiments across six model families and five heterogeneous text domains show that, in the known-prompt setting, full 32-bit seed recovery from the complete 2^32 candidate space achieves up to 100% accuracy, depending on model and text domain, within 300 tokens and under 35 seconds on a single GPU. In the unknown-prompt setting, recovery reaches near-perfect accuracy at 600-800 tokens in about 12 seconds. We further analyze the influence of prompting strategies, tokenization ambiguities, and sampling hyperparameters on channel reliability. Moreover, we discuss several applications of our results: First, it allows for the steganographic transmission of 32 bits, but also shows that ignorance of the prompt is not a valid security assumption.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 47 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  3. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
  4. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  5. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
  6. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  7. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
  8. 2019Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 78
  9. 2024Hidden in Plain Text: Emergence & Mitigation of Steganographic Collusion in LLMscited by 55
  10. 2017Generating Steganographic Text with LSTMscited by 44
  11. 2022Perfectly Secure Steganography Using Minimum Entropy Couplingcited by 44
  12. 2021Provably Secure Generative Linguistic Steganographycited by 34
8 more
  1. 2019Towards Near-imperceptible Steganographic Textcited by 32
  2. 2020Near-imperceptible Neural Linguistic Steganography via Self-Adjusting Arithmetic Codingcited by 17
  3. 2024Distinguishing LLM-generated from Human-written Code by Contrastive Learningcited by 16
  4. 2025SparSamp: Efficient Provably Secure Steganography Based on Sparse Samplingcited by 14
  5. 2025Delving into: the quantification of Ai-generated content on the internet (synthetic data)cited by 10
  6. 2025TrojanStego: Your Language Model Can Secretly Be A Steganographic Privacy Leaking Agentcited by 9
  7. 2017Algorithm Substitution Attacks from a Steganographic Perspectivecited by 1
  8. 2025Prompt Pirates Need a Map: Stealing Seeds helps Stealing Promptscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.