Beyond Neural Collapse: Task-Intrinsic Geometry Governs Neural Representations in Modular Arithmetic
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While neural collapse (NC) predicts that a K-class-balanced classifier should organize terminal representations as a (K-1)-dimensional simplex equiangular tight frame (ETF), modular addition consistently enters a different regime: networks compress to a two-dimensional cyclic geometry in which both classifier weights and token embeddings lie on circles. We refine the explanation of this phenomenon in three directions. First, we formalize a layerwise non-uniform training mechanism: downstream classifier weights are driven by dense cross-entropy gradients into a rank-2 equiangular configuration before upstream embeddings fully reorganize, and once this classifier plane forms, backpropagated feature gradients constrain embedding motion to the same plane while weight decay suppresses orthogonal components. Second, after this subspace locking, the induced in-plane dynamics admit an entropy-regularized transport interpretation on S1; combined with modular-addition labels, this reduces embedding formation to phase alignment, whose minimizers are single-frequency characters of mathbbZ/PmathbbZ and hence equal-angle points on a circle. Third, we quantify why this solution prevails over NC: a simplex ETF gains only an O(1) advantage in cross-entropy, whereas the cyclic rank-2 solution enjoys a Theta(K) advantage under Schatten or weight-decay surrogates, yielding a critical threshold λcrit = Theta(1/K). Our results explain both why classifier weights move first and why embeddings subsequently align with them, showing that grokking on modular arithmetic is governed not by maximal separation alone but by a task-structured trade-off between separation, symmetry, and complexity.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
24 of 31 references.
References · 24
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
- 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 463
- 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 405
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 322
- 2022Towards Understanding Grokking: An Effective Theory of Representation Learningcited by 230
- 2023The Clock and the Pizza: Two Stories in Mechanistic Explanation of Neural Networkscited by 156
- 2022Extended Unconstrained Features Model for Exploring Deep Neural Collapsecited by 102
- 2022On the Optimization Landscape of Neural Collapse under MSE Loss: Global Optimality with Unconstrained Featurescited by 97
- 2023Grokking modular arithmeticcited by 83
12 more
- 2023Neural Collapse in Deep Linear Networks: From Balanced to Imbalanced Datacited by 40
- 2024Why Do You Grok? A Theoretical Analysis of Grokking Modular Additioncited by 36
- 2023Understanding Deep Representation Learning via Layerwise Feature Compression and Discriminationcited by 32
- 2023Implicit bias of SGD in L2-regularized linear DNNs: One-way jumps from high to low rankcited by 29
- 2024Average gradient outer product as a mechanism for deep neural collapsecited by 22
- 2023Bottleneck Structure in Learned Features: Low-Dimension vs Regularity Tradeoffcited by 17
- 2024Progressive Feedforward Collapse of ResNet Trainingcited by 12
- 2024Provable Emergence of Deep Neural Collapse and Low-Rank Bias in L2-Regularized Nonlinear Networkscited by 11
- 2025Mechanistic Insights into Grokking from the Embedding Layercited by 6
- 2024Clustering and Alignment: Understanding the Training Dynamics in Modular Additioncited by 5
- 2024OTAD: An Optimal Transport-Induced Robust Model for Agnostic Adversarial Attackcited by 1
- 2026Deciphering Two Training Clocks in Grokking via Deep Linear Network Theory with Conditional ReLU Reductioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.