Bridging Expert Knowledge and Automated Feature Engineering via Self-Evolution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In high-stakes settings such as brand compliance, clinical care, and content moderation, machine learning cannot be deployed as opaque oracles: practitioners inspect the features driving model decisions, and models must leverage the expert documentation governing these domains. In practice, the data arrives as unstructured content, and features extracted from it must be interpretable, discriminative, and aligned with what experts consider important. Existing methods fall short: they target tabular inputs, lack demonstrated expert alignment, and cannot operationalize qualitative criteria such as 'maintain professional tone' into precise features. We present FEST (Feature Engineering with Self-evolving Trees), combining dual-stream feature generation (semantic and deterministic), semantic deduplication, and tree-guided iterative evolution to discover auditable features from raw text and images. FEST leads in 17 of 20 classifier-task combinations across brand classification, content authenticity detection, and stress detection, with a mean gain of 4.2 pp over the strongest baseline across five classifiers. An LLM-as-judge evaluation shows FEST achieves 60-80% coverage of expert-designed brand features at strict semantic-alignment thresholds, corroborated by a human expert study rating features highly on relevance, clarity, and actionability. When seeded with expert guidelines, FEST refines qualitative criteria into operational features, improving accuracy by 6-12 pp on average across brands. To enable systematic evaluation of expert alignment in automated feature engineering, we release BrandGuide, the first dataset pairing expert-designed features with 1M+ assets across 2,683 brands. By grounding feature engineering in expert knowledge, FEST opens a practical pathway for interpretable ML in domains demanding human oversight.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2026.
Builds on
21 of 39 references.
References · 21
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 282
- 2019Dreaddit: A Reddit Dataset for Stress Analysis in Social Mediacited by 81
9 more
- 2024Large Language Models Can Automatically Engineer Features for Few-Shot Tabular Learningcited by 79
- 2019The autofeat Python Library for Automated Feature Engineering and Selectioncited by 73
- 2024Hypothesis Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 68
- 2022OpenFE: Automated Feature Generation with Expert-level Performancecited by 52
- 2025LLM-FE: Automated Feature Engineering for Tabular Data with LLMs as Evolutionary Optimizerscited by 35
- 2025The Delta Learning Hypothesis: Preference Tuning on Weak Data can Yield Strong Gainscited by 25
- 2025FeRG-LLM : Feature Engineering by Reason Generation Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025Embedding Domain-Specific Knowledge from LLMs into the Feature Engineering Pipelinecited by 3
- 2024An Exploration of Pattern Mining with ChatGPTcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.