OrderDP: A Theoretically Guaranteed Lossless Dynamic Data Pruning Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data pruning (DP), as an oft-stated strategy to alleviate heavy training burdens, reduces the volume of training samples according to a well-defined pruning method while striving for near-lossless performance. However, existing approaches, which commonly select highly informative samples, can lead to biased gradient estimation compared to full-dataset training. Furthermore, the analysis of this bias and its impact on final performance remains ambiguous. To address these challenges, we propose OrderDP, a plug-and-play framework that aims to obtain stable, unbiased, and near-lossless training acceleration with theoretical guarantees. Specifically, OrderDP first randomly selects a subset and then chooses the top-q samples, where unbiasedness is established with respect to a surrogate loss. This ensures that OrderDP conducts unbiased training in terms of the surrogate objective. We further establish convergence and generalization analyses, elucidating how OrderDP affects optimal performance and enables well-controlled acceleration while ensuring guaranteed final performance. Empirically, we evaluate OrderDP against comprehensive baselines on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet-1K, demonstrating competitive accuracy, stable convergence, and exact control -- all with a simpler design and faster runtime, while reducing training cost by over 40%. Delivering both strong performance and computational efficiency, our method serves as a robust and easily adaptable tool for data-efficient learning. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/shengze-xu/OrderDP.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2026.
Builds on
46 of 59 references.
References · 46
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
- 2019Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutescited by 671
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
- 2017Large Batch Training of Convolutional Networkscited by 529
34 more
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 385
- 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 365
- 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 337
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 269
- 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 265
- 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 224
- 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
- 2020Coresets via Bilevel Optimization for Continual Learning and Streamingcited by 191
- 2018Adversarial Active Learning for Deep Networks: a Margin Based Approachcited by 155
- 2021Active Learning by Acquiring Contrastive Examplescited by 154
- 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
- 2020Contextual Diversity for Active Learningcited by 139
- 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 132
- 2022Penalizing Gradient Norm for Efficiently Improving Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 122
- 2023InfoBatch: Lossless Training Speed Up by Unbiased Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 90
- 2020Submodular Combinatorial Information Measures with Applications in Machine Learningcited by 88
- 2016Coresets for Scalable Bayesian Logistic Regressioncited by 79
- 2023Data Pruning via Moving-one-Sample-outcited by 67
- 2023Large-scale Dataset Pruning with Dynamic Uncertaintycited by 63
- 2023Gradient Norm Aware Minimization Seeks First-Order Flatness and Improves Generalizationcited by 57
- 2023Instruction Mining: Instruction Data Selection for Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 57
- 2017Automated Scalable Bayesian Inference via Hilbert Coresetscited by 55
- 2019Ordered SGD: A New Stochastic Optimization Framework for Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 51
- 2021Accelerating Deep Learning with Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 43
- 2020Choosing the Sample with Lowest Loss makes SGD Robustcited by 26
- 2023Repeated Random Sampling for Minimizing the Time-to-Accuracy of Learningcited by 26
- 2023Uncovering Neural Scaling Laws in Molecular Representation Learningcited by 23
- 2023Coreset Sampling from Open-Set for Fine-Grained Self-Supervised Learningcited by 12
- 2023Data pruning and neural scaling laws: fundamental limitations of score-based algorithmscited by 11
- 2022Unsupervised Data Selection via Discrete Speech Representation for ASRcited by 10
- 2024Beyond Efficiency: Molecular Data Pruning for Enhanced Generalizationcited by 9
- 2022Stochastic Optimization for Spectral Risk Measurescited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.