mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

OrderDP: A Theoretically Guaranteed Lossless Dynamic Data Pruning Framework

arXiv 2606.08574 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data pruning (DP), as an oft-stated strategy to alleviate heavy training burdens, reduces the volume of training samples according to a well-defined pruning method while striving for near-lossless performance. However, existing approaches, which commonly select highly informative samples, can lead to biased gradient estimation compared to full-dataset training. Furthermore, the analysis of this bias and its impact on final performance remains ambiguous. To address these challenges, we propose OrderDP, a plug-and-play framework that aims to obtain stable, unbiased, and near-lossless training acceleration with theoretical guarantees. Specifically, OrderDP first randomly selects a subset and then chooses the top-q samples, where unbiasedness is established with respect to a surrogate loss. This ensures that OrderDP conducts unbiased training in terms of the surrogate objective. We further establish convergence and generalization analyses, elucidating how OrderDP affects optimal performance and enables well-controlled acceleration while ensuring guaranteed final performance. Empirically, we evaluate OrderDP against comprehensive baselines on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet-1K, demonstrating competitive accuracy, stable convergence, and exact control -- all with a simpler design and faster runtime, while reducing training cost by over 40%. Delivering both strong performance and computational efficiency, our method serves as a robust and easily adaptable tool for data-efficient learning. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/shengze-xu/OrderDP.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2026.

Builds on

46 of 59 references.

References · 46

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  6. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  7. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  8. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
  9. 2019Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutescited by 671
  10. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  11. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  12. 2017Large Batch Training of Convolutional Networkscited by 529
34 more
  1. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
  2. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
  3. 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 385
  4. 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 365
  5. 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 337
  6. 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 269
  7. 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 265
  8. 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 224
  9. 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
  10. 2020Coresets via Bilevel Optimization for Continual Learning and Streamingcited by 191
  11. 2018Adversarial Active Learning for Deep Networks: a Margin Based Approachcited by 155
  12. 2021Active Learning by Acquiring Contrastive Examplescited by 154
  13. 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
  14. 2020Contextual Diversity for Active Learningcited by 139
  15. 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 132
  16. 2022Penalizing Gradient Norm for Efficiently Improving Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 122
  17. 2023InfoBatch: Lossless Training Speed Up by Unbiased Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 90
  18. 2020Submodular Combinatorial Information Measures with Applications in Machine Learningcited by 88
  19. 2016Coresets for Scalable Bayesian Logistic Regressioncited by 79
  20. 2023Data Pruning via Moving-one-Sample-outcited by 67
  21. 2023Large-scale Dataset Pruning with Dynamic Uncertaintycited by 63
  22. 2023Gradient Norm Aware Minimization Seeks First-Order Flatness and Improves Generalizationcited by 57
  23. 2023Instruction Mining: Instruction Data Selection for Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 57
  24. 2017Automated Scalable Bayesian Inference via Hilbert Coresetscited by 55
  25. 2019Ordered SGD: A New Stochastic Optimization Framework for Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 51
  26. 2021Accelerating Deep Learning with Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 43
  27. 2020Choosing the Sample with Lowest Loss makes SGD Robustcited by 26
  28. 2023Repeated Random Sampling for Minimizing the Time-to-Accuracy of Learningcited by 26
  29. 2023Uncovering Neural Scaling Laws in Molecular Representation Learningcited by 23
  30. 2023Coreset Sampling from Open-Set for Fine-Grained Self-Supervised Learningcited by 12
  31. 2023Data pruning and neural scaling laws: fundamental limitations of score-based algorithmscited by 11
  32. 2022Unsupervised Data Selection via Discrete Speech Representation for ASRcited by 10
  33. 2024Beyond Efficiency: Molecular Data Pruning for Enhanced Generalizationcited by 9
  34. 2022Stochastic Optimization for Spectral Risk Measurescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.