From Correctness to Utility: Gain-Based Prefix Evaluation for LLM Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reasoning prefixes shape the future trajectory of LLM problem solving, yet existing process reward models usually evaluate them through local step correctness. We argue that correctness is a useful but indirect proxy for the effect we ultimately care about: whether a prefix increases the probability of successful completion. We define this effect as prefix gain, the solve-rate improvement induced by conditioning lightweight student model group on a prefix, and use it to train a Prefix Utility Model (PUM) with a simple pairwise ranking objective. PUM learns outcome-grounded prefix utility and can score both complete trajectories and partial reasoning prefixes. Across Best-of-N selection, beam search, and reinforcement learning on mathematical reasoning, PUM provides a strong prefix-level supervision signal, especially when candidate pools are large, search budgets increase, or rule-based rewards are sparse. We release all data, models, and code at https://zhiqix.github.io/pum-project-page.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.
Builds on
10 of 21 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 9
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,407
- 2025Lost at the Beginning of Reasoningcited by 15
- 2025Bounds of Chain-of-Thought Robustness: Reasoning Steps, Embed Norms, and Beyondcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026LLM Reasoning with Process Rewards for Outcome-Guided Steps
- 2025Well Begun, Half Done: Reinforcement Learning with Prefix Optimization for LLM Reasoning
- 2026Save the Good Prefix: Precise Error Penalization via Process-Supervised RL to Enhance LLM Reasoning
- 2024On Designing Effective RL Reward at Training Time for LLM Reasoning
- 2023Let's Reinforce Step by Step
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning
- 2025Accelerating LLM Reasoning via Early Rejection with Partial Reward Modeling
- 2025Rewarding Structural Conformance of Reasoning using Process Mining