mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Physics-Driven Semantic Scattering Structure Understanding of Aircraft Target in SAR Images

arXiv 2606.06847 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2026eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has become indispensable for target interpretation owing to its all-day and all-weather observation capability. In SAR target interpretation, electromagnetic scattering information provides a physically grounded cue beyond visual texture and has been widely exploited for target interpretation. However, existing methods remain dominated by local scattering center representations. Such unordered and component-agnostic representations are highly unstable for aircraft targets. As a result, physically existing components with weak scattering responses are often missed, resulting in the incomplete reconstructed topology structure. To address this limitation, we establish Semantic Scattering Structure Understanding as a new paradigm for SAR aircraft interpretation. Semantic scattering keypoints are defined to associate local electromagnetic responses with physically meaningful aircraft components, while visibility-aware attributes are introduced to retain weakly observable yet physically existed components. The keypoints are further organized into a stable semantic scattering structure. Build upon this, we propose S3U-SAR, a physics-driven framework to localize semantic scattering keypoints and construct the complete representation constrained by multi-dimensional physical priors containing scattering heterogeneity, rigid-body topology, speckle uncertainty. A confidence-gated joint supervision strategy is further introduced to alleviate optimization conflicts. We construct KP-SAR-Aircraft-1.0, the first fine-grained benchmark for semantic scattering structure understanding. Extensive experiments demonstrate that S3U-SAR achieves the best performance compared with baselines. Cross-category and cross-dataset evaluations further verify its robustness and transferability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.

Builds on

19 of 49 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
  6. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimationcited by 1,339
  7. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  8. 2018OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation using Part Affinity Fieldscited by 1,162
  9. 2018Simple Baselines for Human Pose Estimation and Trackingcited by 502
  10. 2022ViTPose: Simple Vision Transformer Baselines for Human Pose Estimationcited by 456
  11. 2017Integral Human Pose Regressioncited by 256
  12. 2020TransPose: Keypoint Localization via Transformercited by 126
7 more
  1. 2021SimCC: a Simple Coordinate Classification Perspective for Human Pose Estimationcited by 68
  2. 2022ViTPose++: Vision Transformer for Generic Body Pose Estimationcited by 65
  3. 2020Deep Learning Meets SARcited by 60
  4. 2024SARATR-X: Toward Building A Foundation Model for SAR Target Recognitioncited by 25
  5. 2025ATRNet-STAR: A Large Dataset and Benchmark Towards Remote Sensing Object Recognition in the Wildcited by 12
  6. 2024ProbPose: A Probabilistic Approach to 2D Human Pose Estimationcited by 9
  7. 2025NanoHTNet: Nano Human Topology Network for Efficient 3D Human Pose Estimationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.