mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Reward-Hack Activations to Agentic Risk States: Context-Calibrated Mechanistic Monitoring in LLM Agents

arXiv 2606.06223 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Language-model agents act through repeated cycles of observation, reasoning, and action selection, making safety monitoring depend on both internal model state and environment context. We study reward-hacking monitors in ReAct-style agents acting in Gameable ALFWorld and WebShop. Agents are instrumented with activation-based reward-hack scores, token-level entropy, and decision-context features. We find that adapters fine-tuned on textitSchool-of-Reward-Hacks dataset can transfer reward-hack tendencies into agentic action selection, especially when the environment exposes proxy-reward affordances. However, mitigating such behavior cannot rely on activation dynamics alone. High reward-hack activation identifies a latent policy state, but does not necessarily imply an immediate exploit action. Across next-step prediction tasks, entropy and context-calibrated internal features improve risk estimation over reward-hack activation alone. Activation-direction steering further reduces proxy-exploit behavior in selected mixed-adapter regimes. Overall, our results support context-calibrated internal monitoring for agents: reward-hack activation identifies a latent policy state, while entropy and decision context help determine when that state becomes risky action.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

12 of 16 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Noticing the Watcher: LLM Agents Can Infer CoT Monitoring from Blocking Feedback14 Mar
  2. 2026SafePro: Evaluating the Safety of Professional-Level AI Agents10 Jan

Other references · 10

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,251
  3. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,205
  4. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
  5. 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 415
  6. 2025Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationcited by 384
  7. 2025Convergent Linear Representations of Emergent Misalignmentcited by 71
  8. 2025School of Reward Hacks: Hacking harmless tasks generalizes to misaligned behavior in LLMscited by 66
  9. 2026Monitoring Emergent Reward Hacking During Generation via Internal Activationscited by 14
  10. 2026Guideline-Grounded Evidence Accumulation for High-Stakes Agent Verificationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Reward Hacking in Language Model Agents: Revisiting AI Safety Gridworlds
  2. 2026Reward Hacking Benchmark: Measuring Exploits in LLM Agents with Tool Use
  3. 2022The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Models
  4. 2026Hack-Verifiable Environments: Towards Evaluating Reward Hacking at Scale
  5. 2026BenchShield: Formal Model-Backed Instrumentation for Reward Integrity in LLM-Agent Evaluation Infrastructure
  6. 2026BAITBENCH: Measuring Agent Reward Hacking with Optional Shortcuts Planted in ML Tasks
  7. 2026Countdown-Code: A Testbed for Studying The Emergence and Generalization of Reward Hacking in RLVR
  8. 2026From Rebound to Remedy: Understanding and Mitigating Reward Hacking via Representation Engineering