mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the training of physics-informed neural operators for solving parametric partial differential equations

arXiv 2606.06164 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data. By incorporating physical constraints into the training objective, PINOs combine the cross-instance generalization of neural operators with the data efficiency of physics-informed learning. Despite this promise, how to train PINOs efficiently and robustly remains less well-understood than the training of either data-driven neural operators or physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). To bridge this gap, we examine key components of the PINO training pipeline, including architecture design, optimizer choice, loss balancing, and collocation-point sampling strategy. We study three representative operator backbones, Deep Operator Network (DeepONet), Fourier Neural Operator (FNO), and Continuous Vision Transformer (CViT), across five diverse parametric PDE systems. Our results show that CViT provides consistently strong and stable performance across the considered benchmarks. Beyond architecture, we find that several optimization pathologies previously identified in PINN training naturally arise in PINOs, including gradient conflicts and causal violation. We also find that mitigation algorithms developed for PINNs remain effective in the PINO setting. We further compare physics-informed and data-driven training under different data regimes, revealing that a carefully designed physics-informed training pipeline can match, and in some cases, outperform purely data-driven neural operators. Taken together, these findings provide a systematic empirical understanding of the optimization challenges in PINO training and inform a practical pipeline for efficient and robust physics-informed operator learning. Code and data are available at https://github.com/NanxiiChen/PI-CViT.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

41 of 75 references.

References · 41

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
  3. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  4. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 816
  5. 2022FourCastNet: A Global Data-driven High-resolution Weather Model using Adaptive Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 748
  6. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
  7. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 537
  8. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 516
  9. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 470
  10. 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 416
  11. 2023GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 321
  12. 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 293
29 more
  1. 2021U-FNO -- An enhanced Fourier neural operator-based deep-learning model for multiphase flowcited by 292
  2. 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 279
  3. 2022Transformer for Partial Differential Equations' Operator Learningcited by 270
  4. 2022A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 233
  5. 2022U-NO: U-shaped Neural Operatorscited by 219
  6. 2023Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Designcited by 218
  7. 2022MIONet: Learning multiple-input operators via tensor productcited by 180
  8. 2024SOAP: Improving and Stabilizing Shampoo using Adamcited by 179
  9. 2021Long-time integration of parametric evolution equations with physics-informed DeepONetscited by 87
  10. 2022NOMAD: Nonlinear Manifold Decoders for Operator Learningcited by 81
  11. 2019GNN-FiLM: Graph Neural Networks with Feature-wise Linear Modulationcited by 75
  12. 2022Learning two-phase microstructure evolution using neural operators and autoencoder architecturescited by 72
  13. 2024PirateNets: Physics-informed Deep Learning with Residual Adaptive Networkscited by 70
  14. 2024Kolmogorov Arnold Informed neural network: A physics-informed deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems based on Kolmogorov Arnold Networkscited by 64
  15. 2023Fourier-DeepONet: Fourier-enhanced deep operator networks for full waveform inversion with improved accuracy, generalizability, and robustnesscited by 60
  16. 2025Gradient Alignment in Physics-informed Neural Networks: A Second-Order Optimization Perspectivecited by 55
  17. 2024CViT: Continuous Vision Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 47
  18. 2024ConFIG: Towards Conflict-free Training of Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 43
  19. 2021Solving PDE-constrained Control Problems Using Operator Learningcited by 41
  20. 2022Applications of physics informed neural operatorscited by 33
  21. 2024Accelerating Phase Field Simulations Through a Hybrid Adaptive Fourier Neural Operator with U-Net Backbonecited by 10
  22. 2025TANTE: Time-Adaptive Operator Learning via Neural Taylor Expansioncited by 7
  23. 2024Physics-Aware Neural Implicit Solvers for multiscale, parametric PDEs with applications in heterogeneous mediacited by 5
  24. 2024Real-time optimal control of high-dimensional parametrized systems by deep learning-based reduced order modelscited by 4
  25. 2025Sharp-PINNs: staggered hard-constrained physics-informed neural networks for phase field modelling of corrosioncited by 4
  26. 2026Scale-PINN: Learning Efficient Physics-Informed Neural Networks Through Sequential Correctioncited by 4
  27. 2025Enforcing hidden physics in physics-informed neural networkscited by 3
  28. 2025An effective physics-informed neural operator framework for predicting wavefieldscited by 2
  29. 2026Physics-informed neural operator for parametric phase-field modelling of interfacial degradation and microstructural evolutioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.