ArcANE: Do Role-Playing Language Agents Stay in Character at the Right Time?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Role-playing language agents (RPLAs) simulate specific characters and personas across applications such as entertainment, companionship, interactive storytelling, and education. Faithful role-play requires more than producing plausible, in-character responses: as a character's values and behavior change over a narrative, an RPLA should reflect the character's state at the relevant stage. However, existing benchmarks largely treat characters as fixed personas or test only what they know at a given point in the narrative. We introduce ArcANE (Arc-Aware Narrative Evaluation), a benchmark for evaluating whether an RPLA follows a character's development across a narrative. ArcANE first builds an Arc that maps how a character's values, motivations, or relationships change over the story. The benchmark then scores how well an RPLA's responses fit the corresponding stages of the Arc, covering three distinct scenario types: scenes from the novel, new situations within its world, and situations outside that world. We evaluate six models under six ways of providing narrative context. In every model, using the Arc up to the queried chapter yields the best performance, outperforming the strongest non-Arc context by 2.2-8.4 points. These results suggest that faithful role-play requires evolving character states and tracking their trajectory, rather than merely retrieving relevant episodic evidence.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.
Builds on
22 of 41 references.
References · 22
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
- 2023Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-Playingcited by 339
- 2024From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agentscited by 212
- 2023InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviewscited by 179
- 2023Personality Traits in Large Language Modelscited by 169
- 2024CharacterEval: A Chinese Benchmark for Role-Playing Conversational Agent Evaluationcited by 143
- 2024Do LLMs Have Distinct and Consistent Personality? TRAIT: Personality Testset designed for LLMs with Psychometricscited by 59
- 2024The Oscars of AI Theater: A Survey on Role-Playing with Language Modelscited by 48
- 2024CharacterBox: Evaluating the Role-Playing Capabilities of LLMs in Text-Based Virtual Worldscited by 38
- 2025The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMscited by 36
10 more
- 2023LiveChat: A Large-Scale Personalized Dialogue Dataset Automatically Constructed from Live Streamingcited by 27
- 2025How Far are LLMs from Being Our Digital Twins? A Benchmark for Persona-Based Behavior Chain Simulationcited by 22
- 2022COSPLAY: Concept Set Guided Personalized Dialogue Generation Across Both Party Personascited by 20
- 2024Mitigating Hallucination in Fictional Character Role-Playcited by 18
- 2025Persistent Personas? Role-Playing, Instruction Following, and Safety in Extended Interactionscited by 12
- 2024CharacterGPT: A Persona Reconstruction Framework for Role-Playing Agentscited by 10
- 2026HER: Human-like Reasoning and Reinforcement Learning for LLM Role-playingcited by 10
- 2025Towards Enhanced Immersion and Agency for LLM-based Interactive Dramacited by 9
- 2025Spotting Out-of-Character Behavior: Atomic-Level Evaluation of Persona Fidelity in Open-Ended Generationcited by 8
- 2025Quantifying Data Contamination in Psychometric Evaluations of LLMscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.