Curvature-aware dynamic precision approach for physics-informed neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have become a promising framework for simulating partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding physical laws directly into neural network training. However, recent studies show that PINN optimisation is sensitive to numerical precision. Existing implementations commonly use either single precision (FP32), which is computationally efficient but prone to failure modes, or double precision (FP64), which is robust but substantially expensive. This creates a trade-off between computational efficiency and numerical accuracy. To reduce the computational cost of double-precision training while retaining prediction accuracy, we propose a curvature-aware precision controller that adapts numerical precision during training rather than treating it as a fixed implementation choice. The proposed method reuses curvature information derived from the limited-memory BFGS (L-BFGS) optimiser to construct a precision controller, retaining FP32 when lower precision is sufficient and promoting computation to FP64 when the training dynamics indicate numerical sensitivity or precision-limited stagnation. We evaluate the proposed approach on four canonical PINN failure-mode benchmarks and an irradiance-driven ordinary differential equation example. We further test the proposed approach across different neural network architectures. The method consistently matches or even slightly exceeds full FP64 solution accuracy while reducing training time relative to full double-precision training on all benchmark equations. The obtained results indicate that precision sensitivity in PINN optimisation is phase-dependent, and that selectively applying higher precision only during numerically critical stages can lower computational cost without sacrificing predictive accuracy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.
Builds on
36 of 69 references.
References · 36
- 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
- 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 634
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
- 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 617
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
- 2019HAWQ: Hessian AWare Quantization of Neural Networks with Mixed-Precisioncited by 387
- 2019An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Densitycited by 289
- 2019HAWQ-V2: Hessian Aware trace-Weighted Quantization of Neural Networkscited by 250
- 2022A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 233
- 2019MLPerf Training Benchmarkcited by 114
24 more
- 2021Efficient training of physics-informed neural networks via importance samplingcited by 109
- 2024Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 109
- 2023PINNacle: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving PDEscited by 84
- 2022Mitigating Propagation Failures in Physics-informed Neural Networks using Retain-Resample-Release (R3) Samplingcited by 71
- 2021DAS-PINNs: A deep adaptive sampling method for solving high-dimensional partial differential equationscited by 66
- 2024Kolmogorov Arnold Informed neural network: A physics-informed deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems based on Kolmogorov Arnold Networkscited by 64
- 2025Gradient Alignment in Physics-informed Neural Networks: A Second-Order Optimization Perspectivecited by 55
- 2025Optimizing the Optimizer for Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 41
- 2024Unveiling the optimization process of Physics Informed Neural Networks: How accurate and competitive can PINNs be?cited by 31
- 2023Physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse problems in complex beam systemscited by 24
- 2019Mixed Precision Training With 8-bit Floating Pointcited by 22
- 2018Analysis of DAWNBench, a Time-to-Accuracy Machine Learning Performance Benchmarkcited by 21
- 2023An Extreme Learning Machine-Based Method for Computational PDEs in Higher Dimensionscited by 21
- 2024Self-adaptive weights based on balanced residual decay rate for physics-informed neural networks and deep operator networkscited by 20
- 2020Multi-Precision Policy Enforced Training (MuPPET): A precision-switching strategy for quantised fixed-point training of CNNscited by 11
- 2026Curvature-Aware Optimization for High-Accuracy Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2022PAD-Net: An Efficient Framework for Dynamic Networkscited by 9
- 2021Adaptive Precision Training (AdaPT): A dynamic fixed point quantized training approach for DNNscited by 8
- 2024Speeding up and reducing memory usage for scientific machine learning via mixed precisioncited by 8
- 2024Fast training of accurate physics-informed neural networks without gradient descentcited by 8
- 2025Self-adaptive weighting and sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 6
- 2019Analysis of the BFGS Method with Errorscited by 5
- 2020A Noise-Tolerant Quasi-Newton Algorithm for Unconstrained Optimizationcited by 4
- 2024Mixed-precision numerics in scientific applications: survey and perspectivescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.