Mitigating False Credit Propagation: Probabilistic Graphical Reward Aggregation for Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rubric-based rewards are increasingly used for open-ended language model post-training, but criterion-level scores are often aggregated as independent utilities. This flat scalarization ignores rubric-specified prerequisite and activation relations among criteria, allowing reward or penalty to be counted even when the condition that licenses it is absent. We call this structural reward-aggregation failure False Credit Propagation (FCP). To address this limitation, we propose ourname (Graphical Event Aggregation for Rubric rewards), a probabilistic graphical framework for dependency-aware rubric aggregation. ourname models each criterion outcome as a latent Bernoulli event in a typed rubric graph, propagates soft suppression from unsupported parent events to their children, and aggregates the resulting event probabilities into a normalized expected signed utility. This yields a linear-time reward computation that can be plugged into standard rubric-based RL pipelines without changing the outer optimization algorithm. Experiments on HealthBench, WritingBench, and PLawBench with two policy backbones show that ourname consistently improves over flat aggregation and deterministic gating, achieving relative gains of up to 15.5% over flat aggregation. FCP diagnostics further show that ourname reduces leakage by 96.5% relative to flat aggregation while preserving more licensed downstream utility than deterministic gating. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/LvCan926/GEAR.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
21 of 49 references.
References · 21
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 558
- 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 431
- 2025HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Healthcited by 385
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Rubric Anchorscited by 108
9 more
- 2025ResearchRubrics: A Benchmark of Prompts and Rubrics For Evaluating Deep Research Agentscited by 80
- 2026RubricHub: A Comprehensive and Highly Discriminative Rubric Dataset via Automated Coarse-to-Fine Generationcited by 42
- 2026HarnessForge: Joint Harness and Policy Evolution for Adaptive Agent Systemscited by 20
- 2026RubricEval: A Rubric-Level Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Judges in Instruction Followingcited by 19
- 2025DEER: A Benchmark for Evaluating Deep Research Agents on Expert Report Generationcited by 12
- 2025Rubrik's Cube: Testing a New Rubric for Evaluating Explanations on the CUBE datasetcited by 8
- 2026All-Mem: Agentic Lifelong Memory via Dynamic Topology Evolutioncited by 8
- 2025A Simple "Motivation" Can Enhance Reinforcement Finetuning of Large Reasoning Modelscited by 7
- 2025Multidimensional Rubric-oriented Reward Model Learning via Geometric Projection Reference Constraintscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.