mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ToolGate: Token-Efficient Pre-Call Control for Tool-Augmented Vision-Language Agents

arXiv 2606.03054 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Multimodal and embodied agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Tool-augmented vision-language agents can acquire external perceptual evidence through OCR, detection, segmentation, and other tools, but executing every proposed tool call is costly and sometimes unnecessary. We study the pre-call control problem: after a ReAct-style VLM agent proposes a perceptual tool call, should the call be executed, or skipped before its output enters the context? Across five benchmarks, we find that the baseline agent exhibits poor local selectivity: helpful and harmful calls occur at similar rates (11.8% vs. 9.9%), while most calls do not change the immediate forced-answer prediction. We introduce ToolGate, a lightweight external controller that predicts execute/skip decisions from trajectory text and simple structural features. Across two Qwen3-VL backbones, ToolGate reduces token cost to 64-69% of the unrestricted ReAct baseline while preserving average accuracy in cross-domain settings. With matched-domain trajectory training on Qwen3-VL-30B, it further improves average accuracy by 1.65 points. These results show that tool-augmented VLM agents benefit not only from better perceptual tools, but also from explicit control over when tool outputs are worth paying for.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.

Builds on

23 of 31 references.

References · 23

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  3. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
  4. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,784
  5. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  6. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
  7. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  8. 2024Depth Anything: Unleashing the Power of Large-Scale Unlabeled Datacited by 1,346
  9. 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
  10. 2022A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledgecited by 702
  11. 2023Visual ChatGPT: Talking, Drawing and Editing with Visual Foundation Modelscited by 659
  12. 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoningcited by 591
11 more
  1. 2023MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Actioncited by 511
  2. 2022Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without trainingcited by 507
  3. 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 479
  4. 2023V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMscited by 459
  5. 2019Depth-Adaptive Transformercited by 227
  6. 2024Divide, Conquer and Combine: A Training-Free Framework for High-Resolution Image Perception in Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 151
  7. 2025MinerU2.5: A Decoupled Vision-Language Model for Efficient High-Resolution Document Parsingcited by 108
  8. 2026LLM Agents Already Know When to Call Tools -- Even Without Reasoningcited by 17
  9. 2025Causal Sufficiency and Necessity Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 16
  10. 2026Are Tools All We Need? Unveiling the Tool-Use Tax in LLM Agentscited by 11
  11. 2026The Perceptual Bandwidth Bottleneck in Vision-Language Models: Active Visual Reasoning via Sequential Experimental Designcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Making Every Tool Call Count: Necessary Tool-Evidence Path Rewards for Agentic Vision-Language Models
  2. 2025MATRIX: Multimodal Agent Tuning for Robust Tool-Use Reasoning
  3. 2026Towards Long-horizon Embodied Agents with Tool-Aligned Vision-Language-Action Models
  4. 2026MM-ToolSandBox: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Visual Tool-Calling Agents
  5. 2026ReGRPO: Reflection-Augmented Policy Optimization for Tool-Using Agents
  6. 2026Dynamo: Dynamic Skill-Tool Evolution for Vision-Language Agents
  7. 2026Adaptive Vision-Language Model Routing for Computer Use Agents
  8. 2026Evolve Vision-Language-Action Model into an Agent with On-the-fly Tool-use