mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive Vision-Language Model Routing for Computer Use Agents

arXiv 2603.12823 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.CVcited by 8

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Computer Use Agents (CUAs) translate natural-language instructions into Graphical User Interface (GUI) actions such as clicks, keystrokes, and scrolls by relying on a Vision-Language Model (VLM) to interpret screenshots and predict grounded tool calls. However, grounding accuracy varies dramatically across VLMs, while current CUA systems typically route every action to a single fixed model regardless of difficulty. We propose Adaptive VLM Routing (AVR), a framework that inserts a lightweight semantic routing layer between the CUA orchestrator and a pool of VLMs. For each tool call, AVR estimates action difficulty from multimodal embeddings, probes a small VLM to measure confidence, and routes the action to the cheapest model whose predicted accuracy satisfies a target reliability threshold. For textitwarm agents with memory of prior UI interactions, retrieved context further narrows the capability gap between small and large models, allowing many actions to be handled without escalation. We formalize routing as a cost--accuracy trade-off, derive a threshold-based policy for model selection, and evaluate AVR using ScreenSpot-Pro grounding data together with the OpenClaw agent routing benchmark. Across these settings, AVR projects inference cost reductions of up to 78% while staying within 2 percentage points of an all-large-model baseline. When combined with the Visual Confused Deputy guardrail, AVR also escalates high-risk actions directly to the strongest available model, unifying efficiency and safety within a single routing framework. Materials are also provided Model, benchmark, and code: https://github.com/vllm-project/semantic-router.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.

Builds on

23 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025ScreenSpot-Pro: GUI Grounding for Professional High-Resolution Computer Use4 Apr
  2. 2024OS-ATLAS: A Foundation Action Model for Generalist GUI Agents30 Oct
  3. 2023CogAgent: A Visual Language Model for GUI Agents14 Dec

Other references · 20

  1. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  2. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  3. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
  4. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  5. 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
  6. 2025UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agentscited by 610
  7. 2024SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agentscited by 567
  8. 2023MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memorycited by 556
  9. 2025ReasoningBank: Scaling Agent Self-Evolving with Reasoning Memorycited by 284
  10. 2024RouterBench: A Benchmark for Multi-LLM Routing Systemcited by 238
  11. 2025MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agentscited by 238
  12. 2025Memory-R1: Enhancing Large Language Model Agents to Manage and Utilize Memories via Reinforcement Learningcited by 237
8 more
  1. 2025UI-TARS-2 Technical Report: Advancing GUI Agent with Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 215
  2. 2023AutoMix: Automatically Mixing Language Modelscited by 125
  3. 2025OS-Harm: A Benchmark for Measuring Safety of Computer Use Agentscited by 111
  4. 2023LLM-based Medical Assistant Personalization with Short- and Long-Term Memory Coordinationcited by 46
  5. 2025UFO2: The Desktop AgentOScited by 41
  6. 2025RiOSWorld: Benchmarking the Risk of Multimodal Computer-Use Agentscited by 35
  7. 2025A Survey on the Safety and Security Threats of Computer-Using Agents: JARVIS or Ultron?cited by 23
  8. 2025Measuring Harmfulness of Computer-Using Agentscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026CUAAudit: Meta-Evaluation of Vision-Language Models as Auditors of Autonomous Computer-Use Agents
  2. 2026LayerRoute: Action-Conditioned Mixture-of-Layers Routing for Vision-Language-Action Policies
  3. 2026Towards GUI Agents: Vision-Language Diffusion Models for GUI Grounding
  4. 2026Evolve Vision-Language-Action Model into an Agent with On-the-fly Tool-use
  5. 2026VisualLeakBench: Reproducible Action-Boundary Propagation Failures in Vision-Language Agents
  6. 2025VLN-MME: Diagnosing MLLMs as Language-guided Visual Navigation agents
  7. 2026Does VLA Even Know the Basics? Measuring Commonsense and World Knowledge Retention in Vision-Language-Action Models
  8. 2025MATRIX: Multimodal Agent Tuning for Robust Tool-Use Reasoning