Scalable Uncertainty Quantification for Extreme Weather Forecasting via Empirical Neural Tangent Kernels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning weather models now match numerical weather prediction accuracy while running orders of magnitude faster, but produce deterministic forecasts without uncertainty estimates, a critical gap for high-stakes decisions during extreme weather events. This paper proposes Neural Tangent Kernel-based uncertainty quantification (NTK-UQ) using last-layer empirical features. Theoretical analysis predicts that UQ quality is architecture-dependent through two mechanisms. First, a variance collapse mechanism explains when UQ fails: when the eigenvalue truncation rank approaches the effective rank of the feature space, the GP correction term consumes nearly all prior variance, destroying discrimination between tropical cyclones and routine conditions; architectures with concentrated spectra (spectral operators) require aggressive truncation (k ≤ 10), while attention-based models tolerate full-rank computation. Second, decomposition performance depends on the non-Gaussian, heavy-tailed structure of extreme weather: Independent Component Analysis exploits higher-order statistics (kurtosis, negentropy) to isolate heavy-tailed extreme-event features, achieving higher discrimination than singular value decomposition, which captures only second-order variance. A data-driven selection rule chooses ICA or SVD from the feature eigenspectrum concentration ratio, correctly prescribing the superior decomposition for all four evaluated architectures. Compared to split conformal prediction (the natural post-hoc baseline), NTK-UQ achieves 31--37% sharper prediction intervals at 90% coverage, and uniquely produces adaptive intervals that scale with extreme event severity, which conformal prediction cannot achieve by construction. The framework requires no retraining; inference-time uncertainty requires only a single matrix-vector product per sample.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.
Builds on
17 of 41 references.
References · 17
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
- 2022FourCastNet: A Global Data-driven High-resolution Weather Model using Adaptive Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 776
- 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 622
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 365
- 2023WeatherBench 2: A benchmark for the next generation of data-driven global weather modelscited by 236
- 2023Spherical Fourier Neural Operators: Learning Stable Dynamics on the Spherecited by 233
5 more
- 2020Bayesian Deep Ensembles via the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 90
- 2024A Foundation Model for the Earth Systemcited by 25
- 2022Single Model Uncertainty Estimation via Stochastic Data Centeringcited by 20
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification with the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 11
- 2023Efficient Uncertainty Quantification and Reduction for Over-Parameterized Neural Networkscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.