mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Uncertainty Quantification and Reduction for Over-Parameterized Neural Networks

arXiv 2306.05674 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is important for reliability assessment and enhancement of machine learning models. In deep learning, uncertainties arise not only from data, but also from the training procedure that often injects substantial noises and biases. These hinder the attainment of statistical guarantees and, moreover, impose computational challenges on UQ due to the need for repeated network retraining. Building upon the recent neural tangent kernel theory, we create statistically guaranteed schemes to principally characterize, and remove, the uncertainty of over-parameterized neural networks with very low computation effort. In particular, our approach, based on what we call a procedural-noise-correcting (PNC) predictor, removes the procedural uncertainty by using only one auxiliary network that is trained on a suitably labeled dataset, instead of many retrained networks employed in deep ensembles. Moreover, by combining our PNC predictor with suitable light-computation resampling methods, we build several approaches to construct asymptotically exact-coverage confidence intervals using as low as four trained networks without additional overheads.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 127 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2023.

Builds on

63 of 127 references.

References · 63

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  4. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  6. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  7. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  8. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
  9. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  10. 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
  11. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
  12. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
38 more
  1. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
  2. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
  3. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 620
  4. 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
  5. 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
  6. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
  7. 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 438
  8. 2018Learning and Generalization in Overparameterized Neural Networks, Going Beyond Two Layerscited by 340
  9. 2017The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Widthcited by 318
  10. 2015Probabilistic Backpropagation for Scalable Learning of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 295
  11. 2018Learning Overparameterized Neural Networks via Stochastic Gradient Descent on Structured Datacited by 260
  12. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
  13. 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  14. 2020Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learningcited by 208
  15. 2019Predictive inference with the jackknife+cited by 206
  16. 2019On the Inductive Bias of Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 177
  17. 2019Scaling Limits of Wide Neural Networks with Weight Sharing: Gaussian Process Behavior, Gradient Independence, and Neural Tangent Kernel Derivationcited by 146
  18. 2019On the Accuracy of Influence Functions for Measuring Group Effectscited by 146
  19. 2020Tensor Programs II: Neural Tangent Kernel for Any Architecturecited by 139
  20. 2015Why M Heads are Better than One: Training a Diverse Ensemble of Deep Networkscited by 138
  21. 2020Neural Thompson Samplingcited by 127
  22. 2017Approximating Continuous Functions by ReLU Nets of Minimal Widthcited by 120
  23. 2018High-Quality Prediction Intervals for Deep Learning: A Distribution-Free, Ensembled Approachcited by 117
  24. 2018Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Natural Language Processing: Results of a Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 90
  25. 2020Bayesian Deep Ensembles via the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 90
  26. 2013A Conformal Prediction Approach to Explore Functional Datacited by 85
  27. 2018On the Convergence Rate of Training Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 82
  28. 2018Quantifying Uncertainties in Natural Language Processing Taskscited by 79
  29. 2019Enhanced Convolutional Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 76
  30. 2019Generalization Error Bounds of Gradient Descent for Learning Over-parameterized Deep ReLU Networkscited by 60
  31. 2019Uncertainty Quantification with Statistical Guarantees in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 60
  32. 2018Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 54
  33. 2016Learning and Policy Search in Stochastic Dynamical Systems with Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 49
  34. 2021A Local Convergence Theory for Mildly Over-Parameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkcited by 47
  35. 2019A type of generalization error induced by initialization in deep neural networkscited by 33
  36. 2016Conditional Generative Moment-Matching Networkscited by 24
  37. 2018Gaussian Process Conditional Density Estimationcited by 22
  38. 2019Conditional Density Estimation Tools in Python and R with Applications to Photometric Redshifts and Likelihood-Free Cosmological Inferencecited by 21

50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

10 papers.