Efficient Uncertainty Quantification and Reduction for Over-Parameterized Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is important for reliability assessment and enhancement of machine learning models. In deep learning, uncertainties arise not only from data, but also from the training procedure that often injects substantial noises and biases. These hinder the attainment of statistical guarantees and, moreover, impose computational challenges on UQ due to the need for repeated network retraining. Building upon the recent neural tangent kernel theory, we create statistically guaranteed schemes to principally characterize, and remove, the uncertainty of over-parameterized neural networks with very low computation effort. In particular, our approach, based on what we call a procedural-noise-correcting (PNC) predictor, removes the procedural uncertainty by using only one auxiliary network that is trained on a suitably labeled dataset, instead of many retrained networks employed in deep ensembles. Moreover, by combining our PNC predictor with suitable light-computation resampling methods, we build several approaches to construct asymptotically exact-coverage confidence intervals using as low as four trained networks without additional overheads.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 127 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2023.
Builds on
63 of 127 references.
References · 63
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
- 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
38 more
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
- 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
- 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 620
- 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
- 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
- 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 438
- 2018Learning and Generalization in Overparameterized Neural Networks, Going Beyond Two Layerscited by 340
- 2017The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Widthcited by 318
- 2015Probabilistic Backpropagation for Scalable Learning of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 295
- 2018Learning Overparameterized Neural Networks via Stochastic Gradient Descent on Structured Datacited by 260
- 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
- 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
- 2020Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learningcited by 208
- 2019Predictive inference with the jackknife+cited by 206
- 2019On the Inductive Bias of Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 177
- 2019Scaling Limits of Wide Neural Networks with Weight Sharing: Gaussian Process Behavior, Gradient Independence, and Neural Tangent Kernel Derivationcited by 146
- 2019On the Accuracy of Influence Functions for Measuring Group Effectscited by 146
- 2020Tensor Programs II: Neural Tangent Kernel for Any Architecturecited by 139
- 2015Why M Heads are Better than One: Training a Diverse Ensemble of Deep Networkscited by 138
- 2020Neural Thompson Samplingcited by 127
- 2017Approximating Continuous Functions by ReLU Nets of Minimal Widthcited by 120
- 2018High-Quality Prediction Intervals for Deep Learning: A Distribution-Free, Ensembled Approachcited by 117
- 2018Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Natural Language Processing: Results of a Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 90
- 2020Bayesian Deep Ensembles via the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 90
- 2013A Conformal Prediction Approach to Explore Functional Datacited by 85
- 2018On the Convergence Rate of Training Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 82
- 2018Quantifying Uncertainties in Natural Language Processing Taskscited by 79
- 2019Enhanced Convolutional Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 76
- 2019Generalization Error Bounds of Gradient Descent for Learning Over-parameterized Deep ReLU Networkscited by 60
- 2019Uncertainty Quantification with Statistical Guarantees in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 60
- 2018Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 54
- 2016Learning and Policy Search in Stochastic Dynamical Systems with Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 49
- 2021A Local Convergence Theory for Mildly Over-Parameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkcited by 47
- 2019A type of generalization error induced by initialization in deep neural networkscited by 33
- 2016Conditional Generative Moment-Matching Networkscited by 24
- 2018Gaussian Process Conditional Density Estimationcited by 22
- 2019Conditional Density Estimation Tools in Python and R with Applications to Photometric Redshifts and Likelihood-Free Cosmological Inferencecited by 21
50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2025Minimum Volume Conformal Sets for Multivariate Regressioncited by 25
- 2024Are Uncertainty Quantification Capabilities of Evidential Deep Learning a Mirage?cited by 17
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification with the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 11
- 2025Position: Epistemic uncertainty estimation methods are fundamentally incompletecited by 8
- 2024On the Calibration of Epistemic Uncertainty: Principles, Paradoxes and Conflictual Losscited by 2
- 2025Deep Ensembles for Epistemic Uncertainty: A Frequentist Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026Invariant Transformation and Resampling based Epistemic-Uncertainty Reductioncited by 1
- 2026Scalable Uncertainty Quantification for Extreme Weather Forecasting via Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 1
- 2026Subjective Risk Decomposition: A New View for Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 1
- 2025PEdger++: Practical Edge Detection via Assembling Cross Informationcited by 0
- 2026Subjective Risk Decomposition: A New View for Uncertainty Quantification16 Jul 2026
- 2026Scalable Uncertainty Quantification for Extreme Weather Forecasting via Empirical Neural Tangent Kernels1 Jun 2026
- 2026Invariant Transformation and Resampling based Epistemic-Uncertainty Reduction26 Feb 2026
- 2025Deep Ensembles for Epistemic Uncertainty: A Frequentist Perspective24 Oct 2025
- 2025PEdger++: Practical Edge Detection via Assembling Cross Information16 Aug 2025
- 2025Position: Epistemic uncertainty estimation methods are fundamentally incomplete29 May 2025
- 2025Minimum Volume Conformal Sets for Multivariate Regression24 Mar 2025
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification with the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernel5 Feb 2025
- 2024On the Calibration of Epistemic Uncertainty: Principles, Paradoxes and Conflictual Loss16 Jul 2024
- 2024Are Uncertainty Quantification Capabilities of Evidential Deep Learning a Mirage?9 Feb 2024