mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AI as a Tool for Simulation-Based Experiments in Literary Studies

arXiv 2606.02293 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems open new possibilities for experimentation in literary studies via controlled, grounded, large-scale, low-cost simulations of cultural production. Current systems have not yet been shown to produce high-quality, book-length narrative texts that reliably reflect arbitrarily specified cultural constraints or stylistic features. But there exists substantial relevant research on each of the components required for literary-historical simulation. These include the use and validation of AI systems as proxies for differentiable human populations; the narrative and stylistic properties of AI-generated texts; the stability and coherence of multiagent, multiturn AI simulations of human actors; and technical methods through which to alter in predictable ways the knowledge and behavior of generative systems. Together, these areas could provide a starting point for more ambitious AI-based modeling of cultural systems of literary production. We describe the possibilities and challenges of simulation-based experiments in literary studies, summarize the current state of the art in relevant fields, and explain key technical aspects of the work. To provide an example directly relevant to literary scholars, we present the results of experiments on literary text generation, including comparisons to high-status, human-authored novels. Our results include the first demonstration of (limited) in-distribution outputs by AI models in this domain. We conclude with a description of future work on full counterfactual literary-historical simulations using AI.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

24 of 51 references.

References · 24

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  3. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  4. 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
  5. 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 752
  6. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 533
  7. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMscited by 381
  8. 2023Art or Artifice? Large Language Models and the False Promise of Creativitycited by 172
  9. 2025LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Methodcited by 99
  10. 2025NoveltyBench: Evaluating Language Models for Humanlike Diversitycited by 66
  11. 2025Position: Evaluating Generative AI Systems Is a Social Science Measurement Challengecited by 63
  12. 2020Text and Causal Inference: A Review of Using Text to Remove Confounding from Causal Estimatescited by 59
12 more
  1. 2024Echoes in AI: Quantifying lack of plot diversity in LLM outputscited by 48
  2. 2025Learning to Reason for Long-Form Story Generationcited by 34
  3. 2025NarraBench: A Comprehensive Framework for Narrative Benchmarkingcited by 13
  4. 2024Does ChatGPT Have a Poetic Style?cited by 12
  5. 2024CHIRON: Rich Character Representations in Long-Form Narrativescited by 9
  6. 2025Too Long, Didn't Model: Decomposing LLM Long-Context Understanding With Novelscited by 9
  7. 2026StoryScope: Investigating idiosyncrasies in AI fictioncited by 9
  8. 2025Poor Alignment and Steerability of Large Language Models: Evidence from College Admission Essayscited by 6
  9. 2025Pretraining Language Models for Diachronic Linguistic Change Discoverycited by 6
  10. 2025The Zero Body Problem: Probing LLM Use of Sensory Languagecited by 5
  11. 2025Is It Bad to Work All the Time? Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Social Norm Biases in GPT-4cited by 5
  12. 2026Lessons Without Borders? Evaluating Cultural Alignment of LLMs Using Multilingual Story Moral Generationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.