Geometric Latent Reasoning Induces Shorter Generations in LLMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models solve complex problems by generating lengthy chains of explicit reasoning tokens. While effective, this makes reasoning expensive, length-sensitive, and constrained to (discrete) natural language. While latent reasoning offers a continuous alternative, determining useful structures for intermediate latent states is an open challenge. In this paper, we formulate latent reasoning as a geometric path-approximation problem within the model's pretrained token-embedding space. We introduce Geometric Latent Reasoning (GLR), which uses a lightweight transition head to predict iterative direction updates in embedding space. Using textual chain-of-thought traces as anchors, GLR learns to approximate discrete reasoning trajectories while permitting continuous deviations from exact token embeddings. Evaluations on mathematical reasoning benchmarks using Qwen3 models reveal an emergent phenomenon: geometric latent reasoning induces substantially shorter generations without an explicit length objective. By replacing early explicit reasoning with continuous latent steps, models often reach correct answers using substantially fewer total generation steps. These findings suggest that continuous trajectories act as compact intermediate reasoning states, exposing a new tradeoff between latent computation budget, output length, and accuracy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.
Builds on
27 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Hybrid Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning24 May
- 2025SoftCoT++: Test-Time Scaling with Soft Chain-of-Thought Reasoning16 May
- 2025Token Assorted: Mixing Latent and Text Tokens for Improved Language Model Reasoning5 Feb
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models17 May
Other references · 21
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
9 more
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
- 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
- 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 668
- 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 483
- 2016Solving General Arithmetic Word Problemscited by 353
- 2025CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-Distillationcited by 216
- 2023Implicit Chain of Thought Reasoning via Knowledge Distillationcited by 165
- 2025SoftCoT: Soft Chain-of-Thought for Efficient Reasoning with LLMscited by 110
- 2025Soft Thinking: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of LLMs in Continuous Concept Spacecited by 109
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026LLM Reasoning as Trajectories: Step-Specific Representation Geometry and Correctness Signals
- 2026A*-Thought-V2: Efficient Latent Reasoning via Geometric Dynamics of LLM
- 2026Why Struggle with Continuous Latents? Interpretable Discrete Latent Reasoning via Rendered Compression
- 2025A Survey on Latent Reasoning
- 2026Efficient Reasoning via Constrained Optimization in Latent Space
- 2025LLM Latent Reasoning as Chain of Superposition
- 2026Thinking in Latents: Adaptive Anchor Refinement for Implicit Reasoning in LLMs
- 2026CALR: Continuous Anchored Latent Reasoning via Render-of-Thought Compression