mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A*-Thought-V2: Efficient Latent Reasoning via Geometric Dynamics of LLM

arXiv 2609.07821 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) improves the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) but incurs substantial computation and context costs. Existing methods either lose intermediate information through hard pruning or lack a principled criterion for continuous compression. We present A*-Thought-V2, a geometric dynamics of LLM guided framework that models CoT as a hidden-state trajectory and replaces hard deletion with an explicit-implicit interleaved latent architecture. After projecting question, step, and solution representations into a 3D PCA space, it measures alignment between each local transition and global question-to-solution direction. Aligned steps remain explicit text, whereas deviating steps are compressed into continuous latent tokens. Directional angles capture both local semantics and reasoning dynamics: small angles indicate direct execution and answer formation, while large angles more frequently involve checking, correction, and branch exploration; their temporal variation reveals exploration, convergence, and refinement stages. To train this architecture, we introduce stepwise embedding forcing, which pools each redundant step into a single latent embedding, and label forcing, which supervises that latent token with a soft multi-modal vocabulary distribution instead of a hard one-hot label. Experiments on Qwen3.5-9B and Qwen3.6-27B across six in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks show that A*-Thought-V2 improves average accuracy by up to 2.6% while reducing response length by up to half, increasing Accuracy per Computation Unit by 2.29×, and reducing preprocessing and training time by 94.6% and up to 80.3%, respectively. Representation analyses suggest that latent states form a compact region distinct from textual states, while higher entropy at latent-token positions reflects broader soft targets that encourage richer step-level feature learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 30 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

30 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Dynamic Large Concept Models: Latent Reasoning in an Adaptive Semantic Space31 Dec
  2. 2025SwiReasoning: Switch-Thinking in Latent and Explicit for Pareto-Superior Reasoning LLMs6 Oct
  3. 2025Latent Thinking Optimization: Your Latent Reasoning Language Model Secretly Encodes Reward Signals in Its Latent Thoughts30 Sep
  4. 2025ReCUT: Balancing Reasoning Length and Accuracy in LLMs via Stepwise Trails and Preference Optimization12 Jun
  5. 2025A*-Thought: Efficient Reasoning via Bidirectional Compression for Low-Resource Settings30 May
  6. 2025Think or Not? Exploring Thinking Efficiency in Large Reasoning Models via an Information-Theoretic Lens23 May
  7. 2025Think Silently, Think Fast: Dynamic Latent Compression of LLM Reasoning Chains22 May
  8. 2025Let LRMs Break Free from Overthinking via Self-Braking Tuning20 May
  9. 2025Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models22 Apr
  10. 2025Efficient Inference for Large Reasoning Models: A Survey29 Mar
  11. 2025LightThinker: Thinking Step-by-Step Compression21 Feb
  12. 2025TokenSkip: Controllable Chain-of-Thought Compression in LLMs17 Feb
2 more
  1. 2025CoT-Valve: Length-Compressible Chain-of-Thought Tuning13 Feb
  2. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan

Other references · 16

  1. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  2. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  3. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  4. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
  5. 2025Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 381
  6. 2025CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-Distillationcited by 216
  7. 2025When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMscited by 182
  8. 2024Large Concept Models: Language Modeling in a Sentence Representation Spacecited by 86
  9. 2025TreeRL: LLM Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Tree Searchcited by 75
  10. 2025Reasoning by Superposition: A Theoretical Perspective on Chain of Continuous Thoughtcited by 73
  11. 2025SIM-CoT: Supervised Implicit Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 63
  12. 2025PonderLM: Pretraining Language Models to Ponder in Continuous Spacecited by 44
4 more
  1. 2025Ada-R1: Hybrid-CoT via Bi-Level Adaptive Reasoning Optimizationcited by 33
  2. 2025Parallel Continuous Chain-of-Thought with Jacobi Iterationcited by 21
  3. 2026Next Concept Prediction in Discrete Latent Space Leads to Stronger Language Modelscited by 8
  4. 2026CopT: Contrastive On-Policy Thinking with Continuous Spaces for General and Agentic Reasoningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Geometric Latent Reasoning Induces Shorter Generations in LLMs
  2. 2026Think Wider: Mitigating Latent Rank Collapse in Implicit Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  3. 2026RuPLaR : Efficient Latent Compression of LLM Reasoning Chains with Rule-Based Priors From Multi-Step to One-Step
  4. 2026Latent Thought Flow: Efficient Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models
  5. 2025Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  6. 2026Latent Reasoning with Normalizing Flows
  7. 2026SPOT: Span-level Pause-of-Thought for Efficient and Interpretable Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models
  8. 2026CoLT: Teaching Multi-Modal Models to Think with Chain of Latent Thoughts