Local MixVR: Breaking the Communication-Sample Dependence in Distributed Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Communication overhead is a crucial bottleneck in scalable distributed learning. While existing methods aim to efficiently utilize data points, such as Local SGD, Minibatch SGD, and their accelerated variants, they still exhibit communication-round complexity that scales with the total number of samples N. In this paper, we introduce Local MixVR, a distributed framework that integrates local updates with variance-reduction techniques to mitigate local noise. We show that Local MixVR is the first distributed method to eliminate the dependence of communication complexity on N, achieving a complexity that scales only with the number of workers M. In common regimes where M<Oleft(N1/4right), Local MixVR outperforms the state-of-the-art Minibatch Accelerated SGD baseline, bridging a long-standing gap in distributed optimization and establishing a new paradigm for communication-efficient training.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2026.
Builds on
29 of 43 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
- 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 595
- 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 361
- 2019Momentum-Based Variance Reduction in Non-Convex SGDcited by 302
- 2019Tighter Theory for Local SGD on Identical and Heterogeneous Datacited by 266
17 more
- 2018Don't Use Large Mini-Batches, Use Local SGDcited by 201
- 2019A Survey on Distributed Machine Learningcited by 187
- 2020Mime: Mimicking Centralized Stochastic Algorithms in Federated Learningcited by 152
- 2020Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?cited by 151
- 2022ProxSkip: Yes! Local Gradient Steps Provably Lead to Communication Acceleration! Finally!cited by 134
- 2021Linear Convergence in Federated Learning: Tackling Client Heterogeneity and Sparse Gradientscited by 122
- 2023DiLoCo: Distributed Low-Communication Training of Language Modelscited by 115
- 2020Local SGD: Unified Theory and New Efficient Methodscited by 88
- 2020Federated Accelerated Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 85
- 2021Sharp Bounds for Federated Averaging (Local SGD) and Continuous Perspectivecited by 38
- 2023Momentum Benefits Non-IID Federated Learning Simply and Provablycited by 37
- 2021Proximal and Federated Random Reshufflingcited by 33
- 2021The Min-Max Complexity of Distributed Stochastic Convex Optimization with Intermittent Communicationcited by 30
- 2024INTELLECT-1 Technical Reportcited by 20
- 2025Understanding Outer Optimizers in Local SGD: Learning Rates, Momentum, and Accelerationcited by 7
- 2023SLowcal-SGD: Slow Query Points Improve Local-SGD for Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 4
- 2023Communication-Efficient Heterogeneous Federated Learning with Generalized Heavy-Ball Momentumcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.